Live data from Hacker News

Self-hosting is being enshittified

troubled.engineer

1–10 of 121 posts

Re: Self-hosting is being enshittified

#4
post #3

2/3 of this article is about DRAM prices. How is that "enshittification" of self-hosting?

Maybe the remaining 1/3 answers the question.

It doesn't. There's seemingly no connection between the handful of examples of self-hosting software actually getting worse, and the earlier point about hardware costs.

Re: Self-hosting is being enshittified

#5
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe the remaining 1/3 answers the question.

It doesn't. There's seemingly no connection between the handful of examples of self-hosting software actually getting worse, and the earlier point about hardware costs.

I suppose writing an article title is hard. The article could be about a few different related things. The hardware and the software side of it.

That’s about all I’ll say though, not my article.

Re: Self-hosting is being enshittified

#8
Maybe I'm missing something here: the great thing about self-hosting is that you choose if and when you update your back-end software. What's stopping self-hosting admins from simply staying on a known good version and forking that if they so desire?

Re: Self-hosting is being enshittified

#9
in the last 5-10yrs...letsencrypt made ssl much easier..and its possible to host on small,cheap arm devices...

yes no more dyndns free accounts... but u can still use afraid or do cf tunnels maybe?

and in some cases nowadays u can get away with

docker-compose up

and some of those things like minio and mattermost are complaints about the free tier or complaints about self hosting? i can't tell

indeed the easiest "self hosting" ever was when ngrok happened.. u could get ur port listening on the internet without a sign up... by just running a single binary without a flag...

Post reply on HN