Live data from Hacker News

QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop

devblog.qnx.com

51–60 of 174 posts

Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop

#51
As someone who still uses a QNX phone, the Blackberry Q10 as my second phone, I’m not just optimistic for the return of the cross-platform and secure os, I’m rooting for it. Especially for portable Linux handhelds. If Blackberry were to release a phone tomorrow, it would instantly be the most secure android phone. I still run some of my favourite android apps on my BB10os via the android translation layer.

Some comments mentioning QNX can run Swift code makes me think of it could also run iPhone apps.

While Blackberry exited the phone market, I’m surprised to know QNX is still the most popular os for cars. With 275 million devices running it atm.

Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop

#54
post #15

QNX is owned by Blackberry?! Blackberry still exists?

$100M+ last quarter, split between QNX and endpoint device software, https://www.panabee.com/news/blackberry-earnings-q3-2025 275M cars with QNX, https://roboticsandautomationnews.com/2025/12/19/blackberry-... AI/robotics, https://qnx.software/en/industries/robotics

Exactly. And there’s a huge community of the old Blackberry qnx device owners as well still trying to survive.

Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop

#57
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The footer of the website just says "Join the Discord Community - Reddit: r/qnx - Instagram: qnx_devrel - Powered by Ghost". There is no imprint and the "about" link also does not give any info.

From the Wikipedia page Developer: BlackBerry (formerly QNX Software Systems) On April 9, 2010, Research In Motion (later renamed to BlackBerry Limited) announced they would acquire QNX Software Systems from Harman International Industries.

And the bb10os was based on this. I still use it and it’s the ultimate phone that supports few android apps still.

Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop

#58
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was mind blowing at the time because Linux required at least 4-5 floppies to set up a text-only base system while QNX ran live from just a single 1.44MB.

When was that? You can still run from a single floppy https://github.com/Steve3184/floppinux and some form of that was available for ages.

Linux was like that in 1995 (Slackware 3.1 or so). I believe QNX live was introduced in 1997.

Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop

#59
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When was that? You can still run from a single floppy https://github.com/Steve3184/floppinux and some form of that was available for ages.

He meant with X & web browser and so on. The QNX disk had gui + browser and a few other gui apps.

No I meant the base system. A system with X would take at least 20 floppies or so with Slackware 3. The whole setup was 80 floppies in total.

I’m sure it’s better now, it wasn’t so when QNX had come out.

Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop

#60

As someone who still uses a QNX phone, the Blackberry Q10 as my second phone, I’m not just optimistic for the return of the cross-platform and secure os, I’m rooting for it. Especially for portable Linux handhelds. If Blackberry were to release a phone tomorrow, it would instantly be the most secure android phone. I still run some of my favourite android apps on my BB10os via the android translation layer. Some comme…

> QNX can run Swift code makes me think of it could also run iPhone apps.

Not at all. That is like saying because it can run C, it can run windows apps. To run iPhone apps you would need all the libraries and runtimes ported, including the whole GUI. Just not happening.

Post reply on HN