Live data from Hacker News

FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

twitter.com

61–70 of 200 posts

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#61
post #39

I wonder how this will work with AI stuff generating code without any source or attribution. It’s not like the LLMs make this stuff up out of thin air it comes from source material.

Best case scenario is it nukes the whole concept of software patents and the whole ugly industry of copyright hoarding. The idea that perpetual rent-seeking is a natural extension and intended outcome of the legal concepts of copyrights and patents is bizarre.

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#64
post #31

Time to create a decentralized, blockchain-based GitHub (GitCoin?) and have every commit be a transaction on the chain. Nothing would ever be takedownable.

Yes, using blockchain to defraud the GPL.

Checks out sufficiently dystopian, yep.

If you could work some gratuitous LLM in there, we could be a little closer to torment-nexus territory. Keep working at it.

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#66
The law doesn't seem to work anymore. There are so many cases where someone can do illegal stuff in plain sight and nothing can be done about it. Not everyone has tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars to spare to get a lawyer. By the time you manage to save up the money, you realize that this system is absolutely crooked and that you don't trust it to obtain justice anyway even with the lawyers and even if you are legally in the right.

The law exists mostly to oppress. It's exactly the argument that gun proponents make "Only the good guys obey gun laws, so only the bad guys have guns."

All the good guys are losing following the law, all the bad guys are winning by violating the law. Frankly, at this stage, they write the laws.

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#67

The law doesn't seem to work anymore. There are so many cases where someone can do illegal stuff in plain sight and nothing can be done about it. Not everyone has tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars to spare to get a lawyer. By the time you manage to save up the money, you realize that this system is absolutely crooked and that you don't trust it to obtain justice anyway even with the lawyers and ev…

So here we have the good guys using the law and ... at least temporarily ... winning... so what's your point?

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#68

The repo in question incorporated FFmpeg code while claiming their code is Apache 2.0-licensed over 1.5 years ago[1] This is not allowed under the LGPL, which mandates dynamic linking against the library. They copy-pasted FFmpeg code into their repo instead. [1] https://x.com/HermanChen1982/status/1761230920563233137

What happens when you want to mix two libraries with different licences?

You dynamicly link against it

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#69

The repo in question incorporated FFmpeg code while claiming their code is Apache 2.0-licensed over 1.5 years ago[1] This is not allowed under the LGPL, which mandates dynamic linking against the library. They copy-pasted FFmpeg code into their repo instead. [1] https://x.com/HermanChen1982/status/1761230920563233137

LGPL does not mandate dynamic linking, it mandates the ability to re-assemble a new version of the library. This might mean distributing object files in the case of a statically-linked application, but it is still allowed by the license.

Re: FFmpeg has issued a DMCA takedown on GitHub

#70
post #39

I wonder how this will work with AI stuff generating code without any source or attribution. It’s not like the LLMs make this stuff up out of thin air it comes from source material.

Everything humans make up also comes from source material.

The real (legal) question in either case, is how much is actually copied, and how obvious is it.

Post reply on HN