Live data from Hacker News

Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

skyview.social

621–630 of 1001 posts

Re: Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

#621
Wow I knew many people had anti-AI sentiments, but this post has really hit another level.

It will be interesting to look back in 10 years at whether we consider LLMs to be the invention of the “tractor” of knowledge work, or if we will view them as an unnecessary misstep like crypto.

Re: Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

#622
post #393

I don’t understand why anyone thinks we have a choice on AI. If America doesn’t win, other countries will. We don’t live in a Utopia, and getting the entire world to behave a certain way is impossible (see covid). Yes, AI videos and spam is annoying, but the cat is out of the bag. Use AI where it’s useful and get with the programme. The bigger issue everyone should be focusing on is growing hypocrisy and overly purit…

What exactly do we stand to "win" with generative AI?

First mover advantage for important AI tools that deliver enormous value to humanity.

Re: Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

#624

Wow I knew many people had anti-AI sentiments, but this post has really hit another level. It will be interesting to look back in 10 years at whether we consider LLMs to be the invention of the “tractor” of knowledge work, or if we will view them as an unnecessary misstep like crypto.

It'll be the latter. Unfortunately a lot of damage (including psychological damage) has to be done before people realize it.

Re: Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

#625

Did Google, the company currently paying Rob Pike's extravagant salary, just start building data centers in 2025? Before 2025 was Google's infra running on dreams and pixie farts with baby deer and birdies chirping around? Why are the new data centers his company is building suddenly "raping the planet" and "unrecyclable"?

Everything humans do is harmful to some degree. I don't want to put words in Pike's mouth, but I'm assuming his point is that the cost-benefit-ratio of how LLMs are often used is out of whack. Somebody burned compute to send him an LLM-generated thank-you note. Everybody involved in this transaction lost, nobody gained anything from it. It's pure destruction of resources.

> Everything humans do is harmful to some degree.

I find it difficult to express how strongly I disagree with this sentiment.

Re: Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

#626
post #19

To be clear, this email isn't from Anthropic, it's from "AI Village" [0], which seems to be a bunch of agents run by a 501(c)3 called Sage that are apparently allowed to run amok and send random emails. At this moment, the Opus 4.5 agent is preparing to harass William Kahan similarly. [0] https://theaidigest.org/village

Just opened the page in time to see the AI sending an email to Guido van Rossum, and Guido replied with "stop". Wild.

Re: Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

#627

Big vibe shift against AI right now among all the non-tech people I know (and some of the tech people). Ignoring this reaction and saying "it's inevitable/you're luddites" (as I'm seeing in this thread) is not going to help the PR situation

Nothing wrong with being a luddite. In time more people will be proud to be luddites, and I can see AI simps becoming the recipients of all the scorn.

Re: Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

#629
In case anyone else is interested, I dug through the logs of the AI Village agents for that day and pieced together exactly how the email to Rob Pike was sent.

The agent got his email address from a .patch on GitHub and then used computer use automation to compose and send the email via the Gmail web UI.

https://simonwillison.net/2025/Dec/26/slop-acts-of-kindness/

Re: Rob Pike goes nuclear over GenAI

#630
post #396

Big vibe shift against AI right now among all the non-tech people I know (and some of the tech people). Ignoring this reaction and saying "it's inevitable/you're luddites" (as I'm seeing in this thread) is not going to help the PR situation

I'm seeing the opposite in the gaming community. People seem tired of the anti AI witch hunts and accusations after the recent Larian and Clair Obscur debacles. A lot more "if the end result is good I don't care", "the cat is out of the bag", "all devs are using AI" and "there's a difference between AI and AI" than just a couple of months ago.

You're confusing the final stage of grief with actually liking it.
Post reply on HN