Merry Christmas!
Tell HN: Merry Christmas
371–380 of 478 posts
Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#372Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#373Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#374Earlier quoted context omitted.
That jgs is killing me
Just because old ASCII and ANSI art is often signed by the author, which is something fun I appreciate, see also: https://oldcompcz.github.io/jgs/joan_stark/xmas.html#treewit... And of course, the BBS Documentary: Artscene episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQrBbm5ZMlo&list=PL7nj3G6Jpv...
I thought it was just a straggler.
Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#375Something to read if you’re bored, https://www.plough.com/en/topics/culture/holidays/christmas-...
Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#376Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#377Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#378Merry Christmas
Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#379https://youtu.be/1njzgXSzA-A?si=KIQy9e39lofX0aYP
#FestivusSavesTrees
Re: Tell HN: Merry Christmas
#380Earlier quoted context omitted.
Weeks ago a local newspaper had the headline: "keep the big bang until later for your children, the bible is really a great set of fairy tales" Im not religious at all, actually "implicitly fighting against it", though I have to admit: This sentence made sense and Im thinking still until today about it, because actually I think its quite true - for smaller children, the storylines in the bible are much more "real" an…
The Bible and the Big Bang theory are not mutually exclusive. The Old Testament is a very symbolic book and gives no specific details on how exactly the world was created, other than the seven days of creation. We know that the 7 days weren't referring to our current concept of a day. There's also no water above the sky. It was written like that, because it would be easier for people to understand. Science wasn't a t…
What part of the Bible are up for interpretation, and what parts are considered to be fact?