Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
windowslatest.com
Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
1–10 of 113 posts
Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#2Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#3Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#4Can someone explain this? Are they suggesting that (eventually) one engineer can produce 1 million lines of Rust code in a month? Or replace 1 million lines of C code?
Using new "powerful code processing infrastructure"... but would it understand the semantics? Are those semantics clearly documented?
Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#5Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#6The simple fact that they have to deny it, meaning such an absurd is widely considered plausible, is already a sign of their reputation.
Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#7The simple fact that they have to deny it, meaning such an absurd is widely considered plausible, is already a sign of their reputation.
Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#8Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#9The original LinkedIn post is pretty wild. I wonder if he did a fat line of coke before writing that, or if it actually were any concrete plans that have been worked out.
How is it wild? On social media I kept seeing things like people falsely expecting the end goal would require manually reading through a million lines of code. It seemed more like people making up reasons to be mad or trying to dunk on the author.
Re: Microsoft denies rewriting Windows 11 in Rust using AI
#10The original LinkedIn post is pretty wild. I wonder if he did a fat line of coke before writing that, or if it actually were any concrete plans that have been worked out.
>is pretty wild How is it wild? On social media I kept seeing things like people falsely expecting the end goal would require manually reading through a million lines of code. It seemed more like people making up reasons to be mad or trying to dunk on the author.
Which is absolutely batshit. There's no way that can be reviewed properly, even if it's putting all of the review work on all of the other teams.