Live data from Hacker News

Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

theguardian.com

61–70 of 810 posts

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let people believe it's deliberate sabotage. Unfortunately, in real life, minions of a dictator serve the dictator; they don't risk their live or safety for a noble cause. Any screw-ups are a result of gross incompetence that is typical for every dictatorship.

Do you truly believe the US is currently a dictatorship?

I’m still always surprised that there are adults who think it is not.

The CIA, for example, is entirely above the law.

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let people believe it's deliberate sabotage. Unfortunately, in real life, minions of a dictator serve the dictator; they don't risk their live or safety for a noble cause. Any screw-ups are a result of gross incompetence that is typical for every dictatorship.

Do you truly believe the US is currently a dictatorship?

what is the US exactly currently if not dictatorship? is there a single thing “President” cannot do right now and if so who would be stopping him? so perhaps on paper US is not dictatorship much like Russia and China are not… We spend decades trying to fight these regimes and lost so much that now we are worse than them :)

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#63
Apart from the technological and procedural question, I would love to learn why the DOJ found it important to protect Indyke. He was Epstein's lawyer, and now we learn that he was personally involved. He is not a Washington person. We expected there to be politically motivated protection of certain people, but is the DOJ just going to blanket protect anybody in the docs?

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#64
post #7

How it’s done from technical point?

I remember reading the recommendation for journalists to redact documents is to black them out in the digital version, print it out, and re-scan it. Anything else has too many potential ways by which it might be possible to smuggle data.

[deleted]

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let people believe it's deliberate sabotage. Unfortunately, in real life, minions of a dictator serve the dictator; they don't risk their live or safety for a noble cause. Any screw-ups are a result of gross incompetence that is typical for every dictatorship.

Do you truly believe the US is currently a dictatorship?

I truly believe we're headed that direction. I've lived long enough to have seen a wide variety of presidents, both good and bad. This one is easily the worst one, in terms of bare naked power grabs.

I believe Trump will manufacture a crisis before he's out of office in a bid to maintain control. I believe he will have learned from Bush Jr. that a simple war isn't good enough, and it needs to be a genuine emergency.

I believe he'll do whatever he can to make that happen. Native born terrorist, or war with a close country, or absolutely over the top financial crash. Something awful that lets him invoke some obscure rule that lets him stay in power with congressional approval - he'll just skip the congressional approval part like he already does.

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let people believe it's deliberate sabotage. Unfortunately, in real life, minions of a dictator serve the dictator; they don't risk their live or safety for a noble cause. Any screw-ups are a result of gross incompetence that is typical for every dictatorship.

Do you truly believe the US is currently a dictatorship?

How would the roadmap for turning a democracy into a one party dictatorship differ from the trajectory we are on?

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#67
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you truly believe the US is currently a dictatorship?

I’m still always surprised that there are adults who think it is not. The CIA, for example, is entirely above the law.

That's different from a dictatorship, though, especially if the CIA is not answerable to a supposed dictator.

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#68
post #22
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Layers. PDF is an absurdly complex file format. It's part of the reason there is no single "good" PDF reader, just a lot of mediocre PDF readers that are all terrible in their own way. Which is a topic for another day. There are several ways to remove data in a PDF: - Remove the data. This is much harder than it sounds. Many PDF tools won't let you change the content of a PDF, not because it isn't possible, but becau…

Thanks for this. Really quells the urge I get every so often to just code my own PDF editor, because they all suck and certainly it couldn't be THAT hard. Such hubris!

I did a bunch of work creating pdfs using a low-level API, object goes here stuff.

As far as I understand it, at its core, pdf is just a stream of instructions that is continually modifying the document. You can insert a thousand objects before you start the next word in a paragraph. And this is just the most basic stuff. Anything on a page can be anywhere in the stream. I don't know if you can go back and edit previous pages, you might have a shot at least trying to understand one page at a time.

Did you know you can have embedded XML in PDFs? You can have a paper form with all the data filled in and include an XML version of that for any computer systems that would like an easier way to read it.

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#69

Befuddling that this happened again. It’s not the first time - Paul Manafort court filing (U.S., 2019) Manafort’s lawyers filed a PDF where the “redacted” parts were basically black highlighting/boxes over live text. Reporters could recover the hidden text (e.g., via copy/paste). - TSA “Standard Operating Procedures” manual (U.S., 2009) A publicly posted TSA screening document used black rectangles that did not remov…

[deleted]

Re: Some Epstein file redactions are being undone

#70
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m still always surprised that there are adults who think it is not. The CIA, for example, is entirely above the law.

That's different from a dictatorship, though, especially if the CIA is not answerable to a supposed dictator.

> That's different from a dictatorship,

Its exactly equivalent to a dictatorship by the head of the CIA, unless the CIA is effectively answerable to some other authority despite not being answerable to the law, and then it is equivalent to a dictatorship by that higher authority.

Post reply on HN