Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
greenteapress.com
Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
1–10 of 48 posts
Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#2Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#3Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#4Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#5Has anyone used the Think Stats book? Is it a good intro to stats?
Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#6Has anyone used the Think Stats book? Is it a good intro to stats?
It's really, really good, especially if you're interested in the why and not just the "give me the damn test I need to run in SPSS and what number to look at". Plus, because you spend a lot of time coding, it's more fun and less dry than most stats books.
I have recommended think stats to many people, and it appears to be somewhat of a success. And its free documentation, which is wonderful.
Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#7Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#81. Think Bayes
2. Think Stats
3. Programming Collective Intelligence by T.Segaran
Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#9The Bayesian book I want should emphasize how Bayes is a recipe for studying complex problems and teach a broad range of model ingredients. Learning Bayesian statistics is about becoming fluent in describing scientific problems in probabilistic language. This requires knowing how to express and compose traditional models and build new ones based on first principles.
An unfortunate reality is that you still need to know computational methods too, but that should change soon enough.
Re: Think Bayes - Bayesian Statistics Made Simple
#10The way he explains it I found to be confusing and counter-intuitive. I've taken basic stats in college, and learned some of the associated problems, though not this one, and learned the material though not in this particular way. I have to agree whole-heartedly with the commenter on that post "JeffJo" who stipulates why it's an ineffectual way to present the material. Furthermore, I found the author's dismissal of the valid criticism to be enough to not want me to read further.