Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Books mentioned on Hacker News in 2025

hackernews-readings-613604506318.us-west1.run.app

81–90 of 217 posts

Re: Show HN: Books mentioned on Hacker News in 2025

#81
post #54

It was nice seeing my 2025 reading list represented. I started the year reading the first five books of the Foundation Series (book #1 on the list). A must read for anyone who hasn’t read it. I couldn’t believe how well it held up 70+ years later(!!) I just finished the 3 Body Problem trilogy, and think it’s appropriate book #2 (The Dark Forest) is on the list as it’s probably the best — but all three are great. I’m…

> Andy Weir’s writing style is fast paced and practically a screenplay already

Oh thanks for the warning. I was avoiding him based on a hunch. Now I know I was right.

If anyone else is weird like me and likes books to not read like a movie screenplay, same goes for The Expanse.

Re: Show HN: Books mentioned on Hacker News in 2025

#85
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think two factors are in play: The first is that there is likely more diversity the deeper you go down the intellectual hole. You and I may read much more sophisticated books, but the books you read and the ones I read differ significantly. Thus, the list is biased towards the more popular (it is , after all, a popularity list). Second is this: > for engineers to be detached of liberal arts? Most of us just haven't…

>although a given novel may give great commentary about a social/philosophical issue, its primary purpose is entertainment. If I wanted to understand the underlying social/philosophical issue, a more direct, nonfiction book will always do a better job. I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding there, if you think all the potential value of a fiction book is some commentary padded by a story. Good fiction usuall…

> if you think all the potential value of a fiction book is some commentary padded by a story.

Actually, I'm flipping the two: The potential value of a fiction book is a good story - social commentary is purely optional. Fiction that has commentary padded by a story are valued only by those who are sympathetic to the commentary. Whereas I can easily love a good story even if I disagree with the commentary.

> Good fiction usually exercises the mind in ways a non-fiction book never would. You experience life through someone else's eyes, you try to understand someone's mind by the actions they take and the words they say, you wonder in a meta-plane what the author is trying to show, you see language being used in non-common ways to provoke emotions or express ideas, you wonder how you would have acted in someone's shoes... Saying the author could get to the point quicker is like saying that lifting weights in the gym is done faster with a forklift, the process is the point rather than the extracted output.

I don't think we're in disagreement. I'm merely saying that I've yet to see someone changed by a fiction book. If there was change, it was always "change in the same direction" (e.g. "a renewed appreciation of X").

I have seen plenty of folks changed by nonfiction, though.

Incidentally, most/all of what you wrote above can be done as effectively with nonfiction. Books like When Broken Glass Floats by Chanrithy Him are extremely powerful. As was Killers of the Flower Moon. I doubt any works of fiction dealing with the same topics would be more powerful. Both of these books could have been written (and read) as fiction, but knowing the events were true makes a huge difference in appreciation.

> There is also a fundamental difference between being told 'pain is an unpleasant feeling that living beings take effort to avoid' and being punched in the face. Fiction gives you a fraction of the extra wisdom you get with the latter.

This seems like a false dichotomy. You can have nonfiction do this very effectively without simply "telling" you.

Re: Show HN: Books mentioned on Hacker News in 2025

#86

Would be nice if you could filter out all the only 1 mention books, and then sort by least number of mentions. There seems to be a million 1 mention books, and I can't scroll through them all, but would be more curious to see books with 2 or more mentions. It was kind of disappointing to see the highest mentioned books, since I've read most of them already (nothing new really popped out.)

Here, did it for you (.tsv): https://limewire.com/d/iZp6i#ZEhH4XXWBC

Re: Show HN: Books mentioned on Hacker News in 2025

#87
I once commented on HN how my favorite Sci Fi novel is Accelerando and the author, Charles Stross, replied to it suggesting I try his The Rapture of the Nerds he co-wrote with Cory Doctorow; I loved it when I read it too.

I love HN - it's basically the only website I visit these days (aside checking mail, watching YouTube, and gardening my GitHub repositories).

Re: Show HN: Books mentioned on Hacker News in 2025

#88

Some more errors: Revelations of divine love, recorded by Julian, anchoress at Norwich, A.D. 1373 wasn't really mentioned ever. Those mentions are of the book of Revelations in the Bible. Beowulf mentions are all referencing the Old English epic poem, not a specific modern version by Seamus Heaney.

> Beowulf mentions are all referencing the Old English epic poem

Knowing the HN crowd, it can also be a reference to beowulf clusters as well.

Post reply on HN