Live data from Hacker News

I made a 'search engine' for fun

foobub.com

1–10 of 72 posts

I made a 'search engine' for fun

#1
This was a weekend project for fun. The problem I had was I felt like existing search engines were too cluttered and I couldn't easily sort results by websites.

I experimented and rather than returning so many results, it returns the results from a few number of websites and tries to rank in on a confidence level from that smaller subset.

I made a 'search engine' for fun
foobub.com

Re: I made a 'search engine' for fun

#2
The website isn't meant to be used for any real utility. What I wanted to demonstrate was just an alternate way to look at search.

I think we've just gotten so used to Google and its millions of results; I wondered, what would happen if I took that all away and presented only just a small handful of results?

Re: I made a 'search engine' for fun

#4
post #2

The website isn't meant to be used for any real utility. What I wanted to demonstrate was just an alternate way to look at search. I think we've just gotten so used to Google and its millions of results; I wondered, what would happen if I took that all away and presented only just a small handful of results?

That's kind of exactly what I saw, and despite the lack of utility, I was like "Oh! This is nice!"

Re: I made a 'search engine' for fun

#9
post #5

Neat. So it just searches wikipedia? If so, I can't really complain. 95% of my searches are followed by "wiki" normally so I can get wikipedia first.

Wikipedia, Yahoo Answers, Google Answers (lawl), Quora, Stackoverflow.

Try putting in a coding question and Stackoverflow will show: http://foobub.com/?s=python+xrange+vs+range

If you put in a random question, yahoo answers will probably appear: http://foobub.com/?s=why+does+sweat+smell+so+bad

Wikipedia just generally comes up first as the way it's weighted. It answers and provides knowledge for most queries.

Post reply on HN