Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m a fan of Alan Hazelden and Draknek’s work but stating upfront that he a) wasn’t involved with the work directly but b) agreed for it to be used years ago, while then going on to write what seems to read as a light hit-piece for Blow himself, and then using that to launch into a point about how his politics and Blow’s don’t align (not relevant for puzzle game progeny) feels like more like him using the trailer for…
https://mastodon.gamedev.place/@draknek/115713018435458495 > The funding for underrepresented creators was a condition of my involvement in this project, so doesn't represent his values so much as mine. He was at least willing to do it though, which I'm not sure he would be today. ( https://mastodon.gamedev.place/@draknek/115713018435458495 ) > ...his company was the public face of that grant, my involvement in it is…
Interesting, and thanks for the sources. I was under the impression that it was the same fund as that announced in 2010 [1] but the date in [2] plus the apparent timeline does align.
"I'm not sure he would be today" is a strawman and just Hazelden's own current views of Blow, but I doubt there's going to be a direct quote (or even better, a new grant from Thekla) to back it up. But yes, 7 years is a long time and the political landscape has changed "somewhat".
[1] http://the-witness.net/news/2010/03/announcing-indie-fund/
[2] https://www.gamesindustry.biz/the-witness-studio-offering-us...