Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT Image 1.5

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

111–120 of 272 posts

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#111

Post by CamperBob2 »

Forgeties79 wrote: post #78
nobody_r_knows wrote: post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

my question to your anecdotal: who cares? not being fecicious, but who cares if someone reproduced your stuff and millions of people see your stuff? is the money that you want? is it the fame? because fame you will get, maybe not money... but couldn't there be another way?

As a professional cinematographer/photographer I am incredibly uncomfortable with people using my art without my permission for unknown ends. Doubly so when it’s venture backed private companies stealing from millions of people like me as they make vague promises about the capabilities of their software trained on my work. It doesn’t take much to understand why that makes me uncomfortable and why I feel I am entitled…

The day after I first heard about the Internet, back in 1990-whatever, it occurred to me that I probably shouldn't upload anything to the Internet that I didn't want to see on the front page of tomorrow's newspaper.

Apart from the 'newspaper' anachronism, that's pretty much still my take.

Sorry, but you'll just have to deal with it and get over it.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#112

Post by varjag »

sharkjacobs wrote: post #8

Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?

Not always, it started at a very specific point. Studio Ghibli craze + reinforcement learning on the likes.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#113

Post by LudwigNagasena »

oxag3n wrote: post #46

If this was a farm of sweatshop Photoshopers in 2010, who download all images from the internet and provide a service of combining them on your request, this would escalate pretty quickly. Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected? Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I…

Using references is a standard industry practice for digital art and VFX. The main difference is that you are unable to accidentally copy a reference too close, while with AI it’s possible.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#114

Post by IgorPartola »

jngiam1 wrote: post #94
vunderba wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll be running gpt-image-1.5 through my GenAI Showdown later today, but in the meantime if you want to see some legitimately impressive NB Pro outputs, check out: https://mordenstar.com/blog/edits-with-nanobanana In particular, NB Pro successfully assembled a jigsaw puzzle it had never seen before, generated semi-accurate 3D topographical extrapolations, and even swapped a window out for a mirror.

The mirror test is cool!

Subtle detail but the little table casts a shadow because of the light in the window and the shadow remains unchanged after the mirror replaces the window.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#115

Post by mnorris »

KaiserPro wrote: post #59

Is there a watermarking, or some other way for normal people to tell if its fake?

I ran exiftool on an image I just generated:

$ exiftool chatgpt_image.png

...

Actions Software Agent Name : GPT-4o

Actions Digital Source Type : http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgori...

Name : jumbf manifest

Alg : sha256

Hash : (Binary data 32 bytes, use -b option to extract)

Pad : (Binary data 8 bytes, use -b option to extract)

Claim Generator Info Name : ChatGPT

...

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#116

Post by mortenjorck »

ezero wrote: post #7

Even from their own curated examples, this looks quite a bit worse than nano banan in terms of preserving consistency on image edits.

Nano Banana became useless for image edits once the safety training started rejecting anything as “I can’t edit some public figures.”

My own profile picture? Can’t edit some public figures. A famous Norman Rockwell painting from 80 years ago? Can’t edit some public figures.

Safety’d into oblivion.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#117

Post by almosthere »

gundmc wrote: post #48
almosthere wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't have a good experience with NB. I am half Indian. Immediately changes my face to a prototypical Indian man every time I use it. This tool is keeping my look the same.

I find including "don't change anything else" in the NBP prompt goes a long way.

I tried all of those types of prompts

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#118

Post by pablonaj »

echelon wrote: post #86
minimaxir wrote: post #4

I have a Nano Banana Pro blog post in the works expanding on my experiments with Nano Banana ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45917875 ). Running a few of my test cases from that post and the upcoming blog post through this new ChatGPT Image model, this new model is better than Nano Banana but MUCH worse than Nano Banana Pro which now nails the test cases that previously showed issues. The pricing is unclear bu…

I've been a filmmaker for 10+ years. I really want more visual tools that let you precisely lay out consistent scenes without prompting. This is important for crafting the keyframes in an image-to-video style workflow, and is especially important for long form narrative content. One thing that gpt-image-1 does exceptionally well that Nano Banana (Pro) can't is previz-to-render . This is actually an incredibly useful…

Love the samples of the app you are making, will be testing it!

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#119

Post by echelon »

vunderba wrote: post #102

Okay results are in for GenAI Showdown with the new gpt-image 1.5 model for the editing portions of the site! https://genai-showdown.specr.net/image-editing Conclusions - OpenAI has always had some of the strongest prompt understanding alongside the weakest image fidelity. This update goes some way towards addressing this weakness. - It's leagues better at making localized edits without altering the entire image's ae…

I really love everything you're doing!

Personal request: could you also advocate for "image previz rendering", which I feel is an extremely compelling use case for these companies to develop. Basically any 2d/3d compositor that allows you to visually block out a scene, then rely on the model to precisely position the set, set pieces, and character poses.

If we got this task onto benchmarks, the companies would absolutely start training their models to perform well at it.

Here are some examples:

gpt-image-1 absolutely excels at this, though you don't have much control over the style and aesthetic:

https://imgur.com/gallery/previz-to-image-gpt-image-1-x8t1ij...

Nano Banana (Pro) fails at this task:

https://imgur.com/a/previz-to-image-nano-banana-pro-Q2B8psd

Flux Kontext, Qwen, etc. have mixed results.

I'm going to re-run these under gpt-image-1.5 and report back.

Edit:

gpt-image-1.5 :

https://imgur.com/a/previz-to-image-gpt-image-1-5-3fq042U

And just as I finish this, Imgur deletes my original gpt-image-1 post.

Old link (broken): https://imgur.com/a/previz-to-image-gpt-image-1-Jq5M2Mh

Hopefully imgur doesn't break these. I'll have to start blogging and keep these somewhere I control.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#120

Post by ur-whale »

oxag3n wrote: post #46

If this was a farm of sweatshop Photoshopers in 2010, who download all images from the internet and provide a service of combining them on your request, this would escalate pretty quickly. Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected? Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I…

> Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected?

Question: Now that the steamboats have been invented, how do I keep my clipper business afloat ?

Answer: Good riddance to the broken idea of IP, Schumpeter's Gale is around the corner, time for a new business model.

Post reply on HN