Mozilla appoints new CEO Anthony Enzor-Demeo

Post by wilkystyle » Tue, Dec 16, 2025, 4:53 PM UTC

0x3f wrote: post #102

WawaFin wrote: post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been using Chrome with uBlock Origin Lite and not even once I found a case when this version of uBlock was behaving differently (as less efficient) than the "full" uBlock Origin Maybe I'm just lucky, but even this argument is quite ... meh

Does it not still suck at blocking YouTube video ads? As in, you get a delay before videos start playing.

Post by whywhywhywhy » Tue, Dec 16, 2025, 4:54 PM UTC

suprjami wrote: post #62

pluc wrote: post #36

> AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. One sentence later: > It will evolve into a modern AI browser One more sentence later: > In the next three years, that means investing in AI that reflects the Mozilla Manifesto I mean if you wanted to concretely see how much ignoring their users is in their DNA. What a daring approach. Truly worth the millions he's gonna earn.

You really only need to make $2M before you can live off the interest forever. That's the goal of these people imo.

Post by IshKebab » Tue, Dec 16, 2025, 4:55 PM UTC

WawaFin wrote: post #89

perlgeek wrote: post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They also have the "extensions that can do real ad blocking" angle.

I've been using Chrome with uBlock Origin Lite and not even once I found a case when this version of uBlock was behaving differently (as less efficient) than the "full" uBlock Origin Maybe I'm just lucky, but even this argument is quite ... meh

Post by idiotsecant » Tue, Dec 16, 2025, 4:56 PM UTC

netdevphoenix wrote: post #118

I love Mozilla but this feels like marketing imo. From the article: "AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off" and "Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser". I highly doubt you will be able to turn of the transformer tech features in an AI browser imo. And they won't make a separate browser for this. This really feels like the beginning of the end for Mozilla…

Post by dawnerd » Tue, Dec 16, 2025, 4:56 PM UTC

exogen wrote: post #122

ksec wrote: post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Technically..... Since its birth, Firefox is still the only browser that manage multiple ( hundreds or in some cases, thousands! [1] ) tabs better than any browser. And in my view in the past 12 - 24 months Firefox has managed to be as fast as chrome. While Chrome also improved on its multiple Tab browsing experience. Safari.... I dont know why this battery life argument keeps coming up because it is not the case. I…

No doubt the browsers are constantly leapfrogging each other, so this isn't always the case. But, anecdotally: switching from Chrome to Safari actually felt like I got a new computer. The difference was that apparent.