Live data from Hacker News

The Patent, Used as a Sword

nytimes.com

71–76 of 76 posts

Re: The Patent, Used as a Sword

#71

If this is in fact accurate (that Apple & Google R&D spend is less than their Patent spend), it's an incredible waste of time, money and talent: "In the smartphone industry alone, according to a Stanford University analysis, as much as $20 billion was spent on patent litigation and patent purchases in the last two years — an amount equal to eight Mars rover missions. Last year, for the first time, spending by Apple a…

If its from the same article I'm thinking about, it's including $12.5 billion for Google's purchase of Motorola Mobility. He bulk of the number is money spent purchasing other companies.

It's not like they're wasting billions of dollars on patent litigation instead of R&D. They're buying companies, including their engineers and their IP, instead of doing things in-house. Both companies are flush with cash-of course they're buying up all the technology companies they can find.

Re: The Patent, Used as a Sword

#72
post #69
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At this rate, any of these laws remaining relevant in 2412 is highly optimistic.

Did you know the property law that forms the bedrock of our society dates back to feudal times?

More through inertia than desire, i.e. past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Change accelerates, and feudal times was not much more than 400 years ago in the scheme of things.

Re: The Patent, Used as a Sword

#73
Much respect to the software engineers who "Decline to participate".

"The disclosure session had yielded more than a dozen potential patents when an engineer, an Apple veteran, spoke up. “I would like to decline to participate,” ... The engineer explained that he didn’t believe companies should be allowed to own basic software concepts."

Re: The Patent, Used as a Sword

#75

Much respect to the software engineers who "Decline to participate". "The disclosure session had yielded more than a dozen potential patents when an engineer, an Apple veteran, spoke up. “I would like to decline to participate,” ... The engineer explained that he didn’t believe companies should be allowed to own basic software concepts."

Yea, the people who actually build this stuff should have a greater say in whether it should be patented or not I think.

Re: The Patent, Used as a Sword

#76
post #39

I would argue this article only slightly missed it's mark: patents are not swords. Patents are nuclear weapons, and all parties in tech have been slowly amassing an arsenal of thousands of them. Some of these warheads are duds, but it still costs money to deflect the bomb away from you to determine that. Others have small tactical explosions. But there are some which are fusion bombs, some are the Tsar Bomba of paten…

The "patent troll" companies are not participating in MAD, since they have no products. However they want the min-max for squeezing the patent licensees versus nobody using the innovation. I think the patent troll companies are closer to the original envisioning of the patent system, more so than MAD patents.
Post reply on HN