For me the last remaining killer feature of ChatGPT is the quality of the voice chat. Do any of the competitors have something like that?
GPT-5.2
31–40 of 1001 posts
Re: GPT-5.2
#32For me the last remaining killer feature of ChatGPT is the quality of the voice chat. Do any of the competitors have something like that?
Try elevenlabs
Re: GPT-5.2
#33Everything is still based on 4 4o still right? is a new model training just too expensive? They can consult deepseek team maybe for cost constrained new models.
The irony is that Deepseek is still running with a distilled 4o model.
Re: GPT-5.2
#34Is this another GPT-4.5?
Re: GPT-5.2
#35They used to compare to competing models from Anthropic, Google DeepMind, DeepSeek, etc. Seems that now they only compare to their own models. Does this mean that the GPT-series is performing worse than its competitors (given the "code red" at OpenAI)?
They did compare it to other models: https://x.com/OpenAI/status/1999182104362668275
Re: GPT-5.2
#36Re: GPT-5.2
#37For me the last remaining killer feature of ChatGPT is the quality of the voice chat. Do any of the competitors have something like that?
Qwen does.
Re: GPT-5.2
#38From GPT 5.1 Thinking: ARC AGI v2: 17.6% -> 52.9% SWE Verified: 76.3% -> 80% That's pretty good!
Yes, but it's not good enough. They needed to surpass Opus 4.5.
Re: GPT-5.2
#39The only table where they showed comparisons against Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3:
Re: GPT-5.2
#40From GPT 5.1 Thinking: ARC AGI v2: 17.6% -> 52.9% SWE Verified: 76.3% -> 80% That's pretty good!
Note that GPT 5.2 newly supports a "xhigh" reasoning level, which could explain the better benchmarks.
It'll be noteworthy to see the cost-per-task on ARC AGI v2.