Measure results, not hours
mobile.nytimes.com
Measure results, not hours
1–10 of 84 posts
Re: Measure results, not hours
#2Re: Measure results, not hours
#3So, praise effort, measure results, but don't worry about time spent at a desk.
Re: Measure results, not hours
#4Re: Measure results, not hours
#5Re: Measure results, not hours
#6I would find side projects to work on, a form of '20% time', but I always felt really uncomfortable with the whole situation. Was I expected to forgo pay when there wasn't enough work for me? It was a really weird experience. It wasn't like I was a student working part time, I was living alone in NYC over the summer and had rent and food to pay for.
Re: Measure results, not hours
#7Even the leading companies/leading people in our industry seem to look at 'hours spent at work' as a signal of overall productivity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/technology/dick-costolo-of...
Re: Measure results, not hours
#8And, here, I assumed that by emphasizing results he meant getting home around 5...
Re: Measure results, not hours
#9>By applying an industrial-age mind-set to 21st-century professionals, many organizations are undermining incentives for workers to be efficient. Every step of the American education system felt like this.