Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

reuters.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 738 posts

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#61

Post by deafpolygon »

Incipient wrote: post #36
treetalker wrote: post #22

Butterick on TNR: ( https://practicaltypography.com/times-new-roman-alternatives... ) > When Times New Roman appears in a book, document, or advertisement, it connotes apathy. It says, “I submitted to the font of least resistance.” Times New Roman is not a font choice so much as the absence of a font choice, like the blackness of deep space is not a color. To look at Times New Roman is to gaze into the void. > If you…

>Still, I would have gone with Comic Sans. I don't often genuinely laugh out loud at comments on HN, but that one was good! Subtle, classy, and a gentle yet effective dig.

Honestly, I like Comic Sans.

It’s clear, legible and whimsical.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#62

Post by RajBhai »

I have a couple of thoughts about this.

Firstly, I thought sans-serif typefaces were encouraged for digital media because they read better than serif fonts. But now that high pixel density displays have permeated the market, this might be a moot point.

On another note, I wonder how much of the hate TNR gets stems from its ubiquity for having been installed on almost all personal computers for the past n decades.

Paganis are beautifully designed cars, but the labelling of buttons and toggles inside the center console look cheap (IMO) because their font seems straight out of a quickly made flyer designed by bored teacher who just discovered Word Art.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#64

Post by xtiansimon »

QuercusMax wrote: post #11
soupfordummies wrote: post #5

"[Rubio] ...calling his predecessor Antony Blinken's decision to adopt Calibri a "wasteful" diversity move..." Bro what. It was the default font in Microsoft for many years thus, it was the default font for most office software for many years -- just like Times New Roman was before. What.

The article says it's better than Times New Roman because it's easier to read for those with disabilities - so of course the government needs to make things worse for them. Wonder if someone could sue over these kinds of changes that are being deliberately made to be less accessible.

Yeah. I have a dis-a-bility. It’s now 2200 and I’ve been working since 0830. My eyes are tired and these 8’s look like 0’s, 5’s look like 6’s. What a tool.

Now! Everything in Fraktur! HH.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#65

Post by manoDev »

QuercusMax wrote: post #8
rsynnott wrote: post #3

This is Michael Scott levels of managerial nonsense, bloody hell. Is Trump incapable of hiring anyone borderline competent?

The only thing these morons understand are surface level appearances. That's why we have so many TV people. - Trump: The Apprentice - Defense: Hegseth: Fox News - Transportation: Sean Duffy: Real World / Road Rules - Education: Linda McMahon: WWE (yes, wrestling) ... I don't feel like going any further, it's too depressing. Edit: I just realized that Duffy is SecTrans because he was on Road Rules.

The "Idiocracy" movie is now a documentary from the future.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#66

Post by porridgeraisin »

js2 wrote: post #27

Previously: Times New Roman is being phased out at the State Department, replaced by Calibri 207 points|danso|3 years ago|256 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34427504

HN commentors on this font change harp on about how it's a waste of time (which it of course is), but that font change seemed to receive a more bland reaction. Funny.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#67

Post by The_President »

jesterson wrote: post #49
rsynnott wrote: post #3

This is Michael Scott levels of managerial nonsense, bloody hell. Is Trump incapable of hiring anyone borderline competent?

[flagged]

Blinken was the name of the blind character sidekick in Men in Tights back in the day, so the preference of an actually less appropriate font for reading is on script.

Re: Rubio stages font coup: Times New Roman ousts Calibri

#68

Post by cafard »

treetalker wrote: post #22

Butterick on TNR: ( https://practicaltypography.com/times-new-roman-alternatives... ) > When Times New Roman appears in a book, document, or advertisement, it connotes apathy. It says, “I submitted to the font of least resistance.” Times New Roman is not a font choice so much as the absence of a font choice, like the blackness of deep space is not a color. To look at Times New Roman is to gaze into the void. > If you…

For about ten years I worked for composition shops, and eventually for a maker of typesetting systems. Through blurred eyes I could tell TNR from Baskerville from Garamond from Janson from ... Some of these fonts I can still identify.

But I have no idea what font was used in the book I just finished reading or the book that I'm returning to later today. My main question about a font is whether I can read it with old eyes.

I do agree that designers should care about these matters. I'll add that for some portion of the reading public TNR more likely means The New Republic than Times New Roman.

[Five minutes later: the book just finished, What We Can Know by Ian McEwan, appears to be set in Palatino, never a favorite of mine. The one I'm returning to, I'm not sure.]

Post reply on HN