51–60 of 1001 posts
This suffers from a common pitfall of LLM's, context taint. You can see it is obviously the front page from today with slight "future" variation, the result ends up being very formulaic.
Surely there's gotta be a better term for this. Recency bias?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taint_checking
https://semgrep.dev/docs/writing-rules/data-flow/taint-mode/...
"Why I still write raw code instead of prompting the compiler" and "Show HN: A text editor that doesn't use AI" are my two favorite ones.
Things that I haven't thought but, after seeing it, makes total sense. Scary.
I would love to see the hallucinated comments of these! Some seem interesting — I wonder how HN suggests to prevent ad-injection in AR glasses?
> Running LLaMA-12 7B on a contact lens with WASM (arxiv.org) Laughed out loud at this onion-like headline
All other tech companies are really shitty but only Zuck would be ok with very intimate use of AI like this
Dramatically underestimates MS Office 365 price per user inflation (IMO).
Office 365 will have been renamed 3 times by 2035, and none of the names will make any more sense than 365 does.
It is a bit smug. Like The Matrix rebranding itself "24/7".
Who says LLMs don't have a sense of humor? All of these entries are funny for several (meta or not) reasons: - Google kills Gemini Cloud Services (killedbygoogle.com) - Is it time to rewrite sudo in Zig? (github.com) - EU passes "Right to Human Verification" Act (europa.eu) - Why functional programming is the future (again) (haskell.org) [note: that again killed me) - AI progress is stalling. Human equivalence was a…
Gemini 3 definitely is able to mimick some of our sense of humor. I found this quite funny too: https://www.reddit.com/r/GeminiAI/comments/1pi28l7/i_asked_g...