Live data from Hacker News

Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

cnbc.com

211–220 of 424 posts

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#211
post #188
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is exactly what is going on. Everyone at WB management knows that the Ellisons want to weaponize CNN before the midterms runoffs start in spring.

Doesn't that imply that Netflix was planning to do the same (for their party)? Or are you saying Netflix is innocent here

Didn't you know? It's only bad when the people I don't like are doing it.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#212
Reading the comments -- it is amazing how quick it takes to from allegedly a democracy governed by a rule of law to a corrupt oligarchy. I personally understand the reasons, but it's a bit "funny" given all the grand-standing before about the founding fathers, checks and balances etc.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#213
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a shitty gamble when online media is where it is at now a days. These big media networks are dinosaurs hanging on by a thread.

I think that's over-simplifying it. Some YouTube personality (or whatever we want to call 'online media' that isn't just CNN's website) isn't going to be getting a Whitehouse press pass anytime soon.

A lot of YouTube political influencers have more viewers than CNN.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#214
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Real people work in this industry, though. A merger of this size is bound to come with some layoffs and canceled projects. It's not as bad as food scarcity, of course. But it can do some collateral damage.

Does that mean the DCU Movies might get delayed or canceled?

One can only hope.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#215

I feel like at some level, it will be much easier to just pir.... I mean... train LLMs based on their content. Yeah. LLM training. That's acceptable. So it really doesn't matter who wins, we'll just perform LLM training.

Don't be silly. It's only LLM training if you are president's friend and bough the license to import a few BN worth of GPUs from the firm owned by his son in law.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not even large. Trump is cheap. https://www.yahoo.com/news/opinion-makers-turbotax-gave-trum...

Maybe we're all doing it wrong. Americans could instead be making "donations" to get the legal outcomes they want under this regime. We're not accustomed to the 3rd wold paradigm though it's well established elsewhere.

It's a free market. Just pool some money on kickstarter and bribe the dude to make him do whatever you want. It's the new way to petition. Pool the money, buy his tokens. Make a smart contract that transfers a few mil once the law takes effect.

Do you seriously need a Ukrainian to tell you how to do corruption in the year 2025 of our Lord? In US? In this economy?

Don't be cheap. You can get Roe v Wade back and Kavanaught's head on a pike if you bid high enough. Independent prosecutors will for sure find a pdf file one him somewhere.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#217
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Paramount is dead? Paramount broke its tradition of barely treading water [1] in 2023 by booking multibillion cable losses [2] before being acquired in a de facto LBO [3] at half the price it traded at in 2005 [4]. (90% off its 2021 peak, though that may have been meme-y.) Paramount Skydance–the one bidding for Warner–has $15bn of debt on $600mm operating cash flow supporting $15bn of equity trading above book valu…

How does one learn to think about companies buying each other. It’s counterintuitive to me for an entity with stock to buy stock in another entity which could itself own stock in the first. The way you write it I can’t see why WB would be allowed to sell itself when it makes the most sense for Patamount to go bankrupt some time from now and be split up amongst US media; Netflix/HBO/Disney/Peacock

What matters is if paramount can pony up enough money to buy. Stores don't reject your cash even if you are debt.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#218
post #41

No matter who wins, we lose.

I have seen several aspects of entertainment in my life get squeezed for money (Magic The Gathering, movies, TV streaming, video games) and I have decided to basically quit any form of entertainment which is solely controlled by large corporations. People get extremely angry when Magic The Gathering charges more money, for more exclusive products, in more frequently occurring releases. Rage, grief, and sorrow over an…

> It doesn’t have to be this way. You can walk away , and find more fulfilling activities that you control.

For some people, they may their particular hobby/form of entertainment a core part of their identity. So walking away feels a huge indictment of themselves in particular. It can be hard for people to find something else to "pivot" their identity to in many cases.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#219
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Real people work in this industry, though. A merger of this size is bound to come with some layoffs and canceled projects. It's not as bad as food scarcity, of course. But it can do some collateral damage.

That, plus fewer studios mean less creativity goes to the mainstream. If you thought AI slop was bad, go re-watch Star Wars Episode 8.

You will still have Amazon, Apple, Paramount, Disney, and NetMax spending billions each on content and streaming and Sony being the mercenary creating content for the highest bidder.

WB under Discovery was already becoming an also ran and more financial engineering than a real company.

Re: Paramount launches hostile bid for Warner Bros

#220
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are not forced to buy their product, or to buy into their schedule.

Once Netflix buys all of these companies, you won't ever be able to watch a WB movie without a $25 netflix sub per month. (and yeah, when they are done buying all the competition that's what the monthly will be.

So essentially less than the cost of two tickets to see a movie in theaters today. The horror.
Post reply on HN