You are not forced to buy their product, or to buy into their schedule.
You can only vote with your feet if you can step somewhere else. We are watching locations for your feet to go shrink in real time.
You don't need the streaming service though, you can just do without or find other methods of obtaining their content. It's not like food, electricity, or water where you may have no actual options or very limited options. Movies and shows are wants, not needs, and people can walk away and fill the time some other way.
You are not forced to buy their product, or to buy into their schedule.
Once Netflix buys all of these companies, you won't ever be able to watch a WB movie without a $25 netflix sub per month. (and yeah, when they are done buying all the competition that's what the monthly will be.
I must be thte only one who like Paramount+ Honestly would rather have the Warner Bros content over there than on Netflix.
It has really strange bugs like with an hour left of a Champions League match it thought it had reached the end credits of the show and tried to automatically start showing something else. Was confusing figuring out how to tell it I wanted to really watch the "end credits" which was the last hour of the soccer contest.
That's interesting as the Champions League is the most compelling thing for me to consider P+ subscription. Unfortunately for P+ it just hasn't been compelling enough. I feel for the Peacock subscription to watch EPL, but even with that subscription there are matches only on USA and maybe also on Telemundo. I can only imagine P+ doing similar, and I'm just not here for it
Once Netflix buys all of these companies, you won't ever be able to watch a WB movie without a $25 netflix sub per month. (and yeah, when they are done buying all the competition that's what the monthly will be.
> Once Netflix buys all of these companies, you won't ever be able to watch a WB movie without a $25 netflix sub per month. (and yeah, when they are done buying all the competition that's what the monthly will be. That's kind of a silly argument. "People are better off paying $100+/month for 4+ streaming services than $25/month for one that has everything." If your argument were that you'd have to pay more than the c…
thats not how most people do streaming, they consume everything on netflix - when the content gets stale, they cancel, move to P+, consume for a few months, stale, d+, stale, A+, etc....
1 at a time
The best outcome would be for all of the bids to fail, all the streaming services would bleed money due to people sick of the siloing, and for there to be multiple streaming services competing on experience because they all have access to the same catalog. The second best outcome would be the cartoon villain Larry not getting what he wants.
> and for there to be multiple streaming services competing on experience because they all have access to the same catalog.
That's a weird way to write "and for us to go back to owning copies of movies instead of just renting them."
For a large enough "donation" the current administration will approve any merger.
Not even large. Trump is cheap. https://www.yahoo.com/news/opinion-makers-turbotax-gave-trum...
Maybe we're all doing it wrong. Americans could instead be making "donations" to get the legal outcomes they want under this regime. We're not accustomed to the 3rd wold paradigm though it's well established elsewhere.
> Once Netflix buys all of these companies, you won't ever be able to watch a WB movie without a $25 netflix sub per month. (and yeah, when they are done buying all the competition that's what the monthly will be. That's kind of a silly argument. "People are better off paying $100+/month for 4+ streaming services than $25/month for one that has everything." If your argument were that you'd have to pay more than the c…
thats not how most people do streaming, they consume everything on netflix - when the content gets stale, they cancel, move to P+, consume for a few months, stale, d+, stale, A+, etc.... 1 at a time
That's what some people do, the average household (per polling) has 4+ video service subscriptions.
Does WB have to pay the breakup fee to Netflix if a Paramount hostile takeover succeeds?
This has nothing to do with the Netflix bid. Warner bros is being divided into the cable TV stations + discover channel stations and the movie studio and the backlog is separate. Netflix wants the movie studio + tv back catalog
The article bullet point referencing WB Discovery could mislead some into thinking that this takeover is only for the Discovery portion, but that's not the case. $30 would not be for Discovery only (as Netflix's bid is $27.75), it's for the whole kit and caboodle. Yes there are two entities, but/and Paramount wants it all, and the takeover intent is for both.
They tilt like everyone else - maybe the chaos and mayhem behind the last few years of this industry mean the old guard is finally failing, and we'll see meaningful copyright reform and sanity in our lifetime.
> we'll see meaningful copyright reform and sanity in our lifetime. I think there is a better chance of the state collapsing than there is of seeing meaningful IP reform
The state collapsing might effectively be copyright reform at the same time though so there's that?