I’m pretty confused by the innuendo in the posters comment to even get what they are saying, but I can report from the south side of chicago that surveillance cameras are largely popular across demographics.
He's suggesting that Oak Park is supportive of Flock cameras because we're afraid of Black folks.
Not black, poor, perhaps "methy" even. Any crossover with black is purely coincidental.
He's suggesting that Oak Park is supportive of Flock cameras because we're afraid of Black folks.
Not black, poor, perhaps "methy" even. Any crossover with black is purely coincidental. I don't think you're racist in the slightest.
You don't know anything about me or about Oak Park. We killed our Flock contract. I did a good bit of the policy lifting to make that happen, including co-writing our initial pilot ALPR police General Order to lock them down and set up the transparency reporting that enabled us to make the case for killing them. But, keep going, I'm interested in what else you can confidently state about my work.
Not black, poor, perhaps "methy" even. Any crossover with black is purely coincidental. I don't think you're racist in the slightest.
You don't know anything about me or about Oak Park. We killed our Flock contract . I did a good bit of the policy lifting to make that happen, including co-writing our initial pilot ALPR police General Order to lock them down and set up the transparency reporting that enabled us to make the case for killing them. But, keep going, I'm interested in what else you can confidently state about my work.
Speaking as a person of color, the government Oak Park prosecuted me for reasons of my blackness which is racist. The controversey that followed, if you ask me, is why the cameras got shot down. Transparency and not being big brother is just a convenient excuse to put a positive spin on it, as politicians do.
Since the page is currently down and I have no idea what flocked means in the context of license plates, can I assume this is US specific?
ANPR cameras which the rest of the world (and apparently America) have had for decades have recently become big news in America, I believe because they're now being used for immigration purposes? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_number-plate_recogni... I'm not sure why these are so bad but generally everyone loves things like Ring cameras which do the same thing but with people rather than vehicles. I suspect…
They are being set up "for immigration purposes" but that's just a guise for a nation wide integrated system for cops and intel agencies to track every single American in every car down. They want keep an active, real time record of wherever we go and what patterns they exhibit for the algos to predict crime from anything they consider suspicious, possibly for future malicious purposes in a police state.
You don't know anything about me or about Oak Park. We killed our Flock contract . I did a good bit of the policy lifting to make that happen, including co-writing our initial pilot ALPR police General Order to lock them down and set up the transparency reporting that enabled us to make the case for killing them. But, keep going, I'm interested in what else you can confidently state about my work.
Speaking as a person of color, the government Oak Park prosecuted me for reasons of my blackness which is racist. The controversey that followed, if you ask me, is why the cameras got shot down. Transparency and not being big brother is just a convenient excuse to put a positive spin on it, as politicians do.
Knowing in extreme and annoying detail exactly the series of events that led us to kill our Flock contract, I do not believe this is at all true. I don't think trolling is a good plan here.
Why do you think so? LOVEINT is indeed a thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOVEINT
I know it's a thing. That was just my reaction reading the OP. First paragraph: reasonable, if ignoring that access it not likely to be unrestricted willy-nilly. Second paragraph: not as reasonable given that Amazon likely comply without issue with us intelligence, and sell the data to third parties, which the police could just buy (similar has been done) to avoid consent or legal obstacles. Third paragraph: out of n…
Most people consider "intelligency agency" as part of the umbrella term "cops"
The HN guidelines ask users to assume the most charitable interpretation/good faith. Even for "big name" accounts.
"You're posting too fast. Please slow down. Thanks." Is the response I get for my good faith arguments. This is a forum run by tech oligarchs. Speech is being modified on here.
Try speaking ill of a big tech CEO with links to YC and you'll find out quickly that that's not "curious conversation" lmao
If YouTube personalities can break into the hardware, I wouldn't be surprised if foreign intelligence has already figured out a way. Clownin
Why should I care if some low-ranking party official in China knows where I drive, when my actual government will use that data to deport me if I sufficiently piss it off?
Well, it's nice to know which cars are in the parking lot of a Booz-Allen office all day, and that there's one guy that on Thursday nights they drive to an Off Track Betting parlor for a couple of hours before driving back to their gated community and the cameras in that gated community show that the person has just one car. Let's set a honey trap for him next week at the OTB parlor and find out what he does and if he's of use.