Live data from Hacker News

US sets 2027 deadline for Europe-led NATO defense

reuters.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: US sets 2027 deadline for Europe-led NATO defense

#11
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Yet continued to trade as usual with Russia and took no steps to reduce reliance on Russia in strategic sectors. And some European countries are still doing that. They are even trying to strengthen their ties with Russia. Because they are sovereign states with their own interests, which do not always align with the EU, NATO, or the US.

Absolutely, and as such, we as the United States are pivoting for our own strategic reasons.

And the outcome of that pivot might not be what you wanted. Because the American world order does not maintain itself on its own. Not even in Europe.

Without American commitment, Europe will likely become more fragmented. Some countries will remain aligned with the US. Some will become unaligned, and some will align with Russia and/or China.

Re: US sets 2027 deadline for Europe-led NATO defense

#13
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From a European perspective, the primary purpose of NATO between 1992 and 2022 was to avoid wasting money on defense. Europe was willing to accept a world order, where the US was the hegemon and paid for the privilege. If the US does not want to do that anymore, European countries will grudgingly increase defense spending. To the extent they feel threatened. The is no expectation that Europe would help the US in the…

> the primary purpose of NATO between 1992 and 2022 was to avoid wasting money on defense. Europe was willing to accept a world order, where the US was the hegemon and paid for the privilege We shifted away from that policy in the Obama administration as part of the Pivot to Asia. We publicly vocalized this shift in strategy [0] during my time in the policy space. Europe did not listen. Instead, they dragged us into…

I found your commentary very tasteful, do you write on X or elsewhere?
Post reply on HN