Not to disrespect this, but it used to be entirely normal to have a GUI environment on a machine with 2MB of RAM and a 40MB disk. Or 128K of ram and 400 kb disk for that matter.
Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
11–20 of 258 posts
Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
#12Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
#13Looks really nice, I like the idea. But can they please empower a user interface designer to simply improve the margins and paddings of their interface? With a bunch of small improvements it would look significantly better. Just fix the spacing between buttons and borders and other UI elements.
One could argue that visible borders are a feature, not a bug. If you are trying to maximize for accessibility, that is.
Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
#14The site doesn't have HTTPS and there doesn't seem to be any mention of signatures on the downloads page. Any way to check it hasn't been MITM'd?
Not foolproof. Could compute MD5 or SHA256 after downloading.
EDIT: nevermind, I see that it has the md5 in a text file here: http://www.tinycorelinux.net/16.x/x86/release/
Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
#15Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
#16[flagged]
Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
#17Not to disrespect this, but it used to be entirely normal to have a GUI environment on a machine with 2MB of RAM and a 40MB disk. Or 128K of ram and 400 kb disk for that matter.
Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not foolproof. Could compute MD5 or SHA256 after downloading.
And compare it against what? EDIT: nevermind, I see that it has the md5 in a text file here: http://www.tinycorelinux.net/16.x/x86/release/
Re: Tiny Core Linux: a 23 MB Linux distro with graphical desktop
#19Looks really nice, I like the idea. But can they please empower a user interface designer to simply improve the margins and paddings of their interface? With a bunch of small improvements it would look significantly better. Just fix the spacing between buttons and borders and other UI elements.
Modern UX trends are a scourge of excessive whitespace and low information density that get in the way of actually accomplishing tasks. Any project that rejects those trends gets bonus points in my book.