241–250 of 345 posts
... but what about when non-US citizens leave the US?
For example, as a Canadian, if I'm down in the US and, on my way back up to Canada, a US border officer requests access to my phone and I decline... what happens then?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure I understand what you are asking.
[flagged]
I do understand that performative victimhood is much easier as it does not require much intellectual honesty.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love how bad that list is.
For what it's worth, the somewhat hilarious reason justpaste.it is on the list is likely that it used to be a favourite of Islamic State terrorists a decade ago. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/08/islamic-stat... Googling 'site:gov "justpaste.it"' also brings endless results of government documents mentioning the site in the context of terrorism. I somewhat doubt US immigration authorities thwarted any w…
Have you handled cases/seen outcomes of self employed founders' H1B applications under the new rule?
Yes. The forms only require disclosure of ownership if it is above 50% so this has made it much easier for international founders (with cofounders) to obtain H-1B status. The challenge comes when ownership exceeds 50%.
A few I registered a company in Delaware as a foreign company for SaaS business.
I have been unable to complete an organization certificate for my website.
Unfortunately I could not get one since my legal phone is not the way to reach me and they tell me that they cannot change that phone to reach me according to my legal representatives in Delaware.
I need some kind of certificate of good standing or being able to have a verifiable phone and/or email to reach me in a "reliable" way from a third party source.
How could I proceed for this, since I am not knowledgeable of the law in Delaware. Probably I need an attorney and I would be happy if I can be recommended one that could emit such verification.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ICE cannot legally arrest people who are citizens for no reason, and yet they have done exactly that 30% of the time by their own admission. Where are you getting that statistic (honest question)?
I overstated, but it's murky. https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/12/05/despite-medias-claims-ic... Why would ICE leave the number as low as "70%" if they could be higher? Every illegal alien is a criminal as far as the law is concerned. Every illegal alien arrested is "charged with a crime". Otherwise ICE is openly stating to its supporters that they arrest illegal aliens and then release them, something their supporters…
> 70% of ICE arrests are of criminal illegal aliens charged with or convicted of crimes in the U.S.
I believe the claim here is that 70% of the people ICE arrests have been charged with or convicted of crimes other than being present in the USA illegally. I don't think this is at all meant to imply that 30% of arrests are of people who are present in the USA legally. I think it's just sloppy writing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There was just an article in the NYT where ICE is arresting people at the end of their green card interviews for essentially no reason. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/26/us/trump-green-card-inter...
That’s misinformation. They’re being arrested because they were in the country illegally, usually overstaying a visa: https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/immigration/green-card... They have a green card interview because they married an American. But you can’t get an adjustment of status if you are in violation of your current visa terms.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A country can not deny entry to its own citizens. They can immediately arrest you, however.
But not for not giving them access to your phone.