Maybe slightly off topic to the article, but I don't really care what Peter Thiel has to say. I do think we need to collectively think about how to not give these people a microphone. It's one thing to have concentrated wealth. It's a very different thing to have concentrated wealth and people's attention. I think that's a much more interesting discussion :).
This is the article's second sentence: "Thiel’s lurid, apocalyptic view of world politics may be ludicrous or even deranged, but his wealth and power mean that we can’t afford to ignore it."
Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
171–180 of 281 posts
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
Power might be hard to ignore, but wealth you literally just can.
It’s naive to believe these are not connected. Wealth buys power.
Raw power > wealth (see Putin, Vladimir: he doesn't need wealth or even to "own" anything, his raw power gets him everything wealth can buy and more). But for weaker people who aren't so powerful to control the system itself, wealth can get you a lot of power within that system.
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#173> This is what Thiel’s apocalyptic geopolitics looks like in practice: a twisted military-industrial eschatology where an AI-powered genocide is understood to be “restraining” rather than enacting the end of the world. I could have used some more explication on the connection between Thiel's ideology and Palantir's project portfolio. I felt like this article was structured like "Part 1: Thiel is Crazy, Part 2: Palant…
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#174While it's possible this is true, I would have preferred that the article make its own case on why Thiel is crazy and not just cite the Guardian. The article is written for someone who already agrees with the title.
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
100M+ dead ideology
Not sure why people keep bringing this up. Every ideology has blood on their hands, but communism is nowhere near #1. Try comparing the death tolls/genocides/etc of the capitalist/anti-communist side with the communist side.
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think "facists" is a tiring word to describe them. I would recommend christian nationalists.
I mean - obviously the modern day communists rarely use the original name too. But I guess we are adults and know that in reality, under all of that political marketing, we are talking about fascists and communists.
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#177> This is what Thiel’s apocalyptic geopolitics looks like in practice: a twisted military-industrial eschatology where an AI-powered genocide is understood to be “restraining” rather than enacting the end of the world. I could have used some more explication on the connection between Thiel's ideology and Palantir's project portfolio. I felt like this article was structured like "Part 1: Thiel is Crazy, Part 2: Palant…
I think the author assumes a basic familiarity with the subject. FYI Thiel is chairman and co-founder of Palantir.
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#178If you can parse the academic jargon and get past the ad hominem, the article is a basic meditation on how the state of information technology continues to support both centralization and distribution of decisions. This ambivalence mirrors the paradox of American empire, where the United States sees itself simultaneously as a guarantor of global order and a bulwark against world government: the “world’s policeman” un…
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#179I would have never believed it 10 years ago. I actually think there is a high probability the world will be ended, not by war or natural disaster, but by an honest to god trillionaire super villain. The ultra wealthy are an actual existential threat to humanity. No one can be trusted with that much money and power.
IMHO, that's the obvious end-state of AGI: the economy eats the world and a few trillionaires sitting atop AGI armies control the economy, and nearly everyone else becomes powerless, irrelevent, and eventually "ended."
Re: Peter Thiel's Apocalyptic Worldview Is a Dangerous Fantasy
#180Maybe slightly off topic to the article, but I don't really care what Peter Thiel has to say. I do think we need to collectively think about how to not give these people a microphone. It's one thing to have concentrated wealth. It's a very different thing to have concentrated wealth and people's attention. I think that's a much more interesting discussion :).
Where to draw the line? Only the right-wing billionaires? What about other more left-wing like Soros. And what about the influencers with millions of followers (recent Qatari influence campaign comes to mind)? What about Hollywood (again Qataris and their influence campaign, if you notice how some famous actors started to speak on certain topics)