Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, the name of the "real" account is "zkevm.dev", and the previous account was zk-evm. Those are just letters to me, but it does seem like a clear link. Couldn't say that either is "real", though.
It is not. zk-evm refers to a type of blockchain. It's not a unique/singular link.
Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
61–70 of 156 posts
Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#62https://github.com/zigbook/zigbook/pull/45#issuecomment-3592... Would this be grounds to report zigbook to GitHub maybe? This is wild
zigbook edited a 3rd party comment to say "I’m autistic and sperging out over stuff on the internet that doesn’t actually matter. Don’t mind me." Just your run off the mill AI grifter. EDIT: https://lobste.rs/s/pbn3zy/zigbook_learn_zig_programming_lan... "Quick research - author's actual profile is https://github.com/zk-evm , and he's a potential scammer from crypto spaces, who also happens to be running fake GitHub…
Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#63Repo seems to be gone? User action or GitHub action? Regardless, for visibility as to maybe-why this happened, here are screenshots of the user editing comments to insult/make them say something they never did; https://imgur.com/a/LsvBXY1 https://web.archive.org/web/20251130091635/https://github.co... The tool itself claims "Zero AI" ( https://www.zigbook.net/ ) yet is very obviously A-Lot-AI.
Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#64Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow. It's also an extremely reasonable pull request, here's the only commit: https://github.com/zigbook/zigbook/compare/main...SuperAugus...
help us, it's gone
Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#66Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#67Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#68Plagiarism is a moral wrong. But copyright infringement is a legal wrong (a civil liability). Is what they're doing infringing on a copyrighted work? Or does it fail to uphold license terms? Many open source licenses have some amount of attribution as a requirement, so that'd be something to consider.
AI is actually beginning to encourage "restricted source", public-only-gets-binary debates to simply avoid such legal issues. Write a snail-mail letter to get the real sources. Repositories are private with a small well-vetted list of contributors. Also avoid slop-PR headaches that away.
Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#69Repo seems to be gone? User action or GitHub action? Regardless, for visibility as to maybe-why this happened, here are screenshots of the user editing comments to insult/make them say something they never did; https://imgur.com/a/LsvBXY1 https://web.archive.org/web/20251130091635/https://github.co... The tool itself claims "Zero AI" ( https://www.zigbook.net/ ) yet is very obviously A-Lot-AI.
The responds and edits are simply unprofessional and immature. I don't hate AI and in fact I use it for many research based tasks, helping me narrowing a lot of tough topics, but it is the People with these kind of attitude turns me off.
I get why GitHub allows editing comments of other users though for public repos I guess it allows for this kind of abuse
Re: Zigbook Is Plagiarizing the Zigtools Playground
#70https://github.com/zigbook/zigbook/pull/45#issuecomment-3592... Would this be grounds to report zigbook to GitHub maybe? This is wild