Live data from Hacker News

WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

github.com

91–100 of 188 posts

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#91
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

massgrave.dev

... and what is this?

From massgrave.dev, just below the big heading:

Open-source Windows and Office activator featuring HWID, Ohook, TSforge, and Online KMS activation methods, along with advanced troubleshooting.

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#92
post #90

Fortnite? Then my kids can stop complaining and I can stop worrying about supporting Windows. They are happy as clams with Roblox and Minecraft on Ubuntu, and that makes me happy. I don't see anything mentioned in the issues/discussions nor on the upstream project.

Other people mentioned it runs on a VM so it probably won't work well for 3d games.

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#93
post #26

How good is it in practice? I've found windows VMs under a Linux host to be frustrating to use, and get poor performances no matter how much resources I throw at it. The clock keeps getting messed up all the time. UI is sluggish. I now use a dedicated windows laptop in RDP and it is such a better experience better than a VM.

You have minimal to zero leverage of the native Windows debugging, logging, or instrumentation. At best an opaque box with one knob and hopefully it doesn't fail or you will be roaming the countryside learning how to perform correlated packet captures at various levels of crappy obtuse networking. Could be useful for concealing non compliant vulnerable applications from pesky security vulnerability assessment teams. Combine that with the price is right and it is a solid 97% win exceeding performance metrics bonus pool refreshed.

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#94
post #13

> Icon in the Public Domain. You can't re-create an icon to circumvent trademark law. Using icon to refer to an application is fair use. I am not sure what's the point of having a public domain icon.

>You can't re-create an icon to circumvent trademark law.

That's not what's happening here. According to wikipedia it's public domain because:

>This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD § Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#95

I see it's time for the bimonthly reinvention of VirtualBox and VMWare's seamless modes from a few faceless techies on GitHub and designed for people who can't be bothered to use WINE or VirtualBox.

And unfortunately it has become the norm in open-source to push out shiny-looking projects with pretty logos and UX but shoddy underlying technology and deceptive/overstated claims (looking at you Tauri). Thing thing uses RDP for communication which was designed for remotely administering servers over low speed networks. VirtualBox in contrast integrates at the driver level, and allows you to share the underlying GPU…

Windows implementation of RDP is actually very good. You get a degree of responsiveness that is unachievable with neither Linux RDP implementation or any other product (maybe barring Parsec, that also doesn’t allow for Linux hosts).

I know that RDP doesn’t work for gaming, but for anything else (even for CAD), it’s the best thing barring direct access to the machine (or, Parsec).

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#96
post #65
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You kinda did... > By accepting this agreement and using the software you agree that Microsoft may collect, use, and disclose the information as described in the Microsoft Privacy Statement [...] Doesn't make it okay, just legal https://www.microsoft.com/content/dam/microsoft/usetm/docume...

There's a couple of terms in contract law, like fairness of obligations, unconscionability, disproportionate penalty, excessive advantage, etc. that the US seems to have forgotten. In the EU and other countries such... aberrations are struck down and unenforceable. People are still scared silly, but the ones that protest are usually left alone.

A good chunk of EULAs are partially-completely unenforceable in US contract law as well.

It just doesn’t stop corporations from using them as a scare tactic.

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#97
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Last time i checked a Windows 10 and 11 license does not permit running Windows in a virtualized environment. That could have changed by now.

then it would be illegal to use hyper-v, since windows is then run under a hypervisor.

The FPP license does allow local vm access. But if u access it remotely then u need a SA or VDA license. If this thread is legit: https://community.spiceworks.com/t/whats-wrong-or-not-legal-...

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#98
post #64
post #61

Does anyone know if its possible to get shell integration working? The sole app keeping me on windows is tortoisegit: you right click, and get a bunch of git commands on your context menu. If there was any way to get this running in linux, I'd swap

This is something I have not heard before. Can you please explain your use case a bit more? What commands do you run using right click? Do you strongly prefer this over a terminal window? You can have aliases if you'd like.

I do virtually everything through tortoisegit, and much prefer it over a CLI. When you right click, you get this:

https://i.postimg.cc/hG4g8pjp/tgit.png

Which gives you basically everything you could ever possibly want. My main use cases for it vs a terminal interface are:

1. When you commit, you get this:

https://i.postimg.cc/90YJBtz1/boaty.png

Clicking the files brings up a diff, which makes pre commit reviews extremely easy. Its a lot faster to add files via an interface like this, rather than using a cli

2. The graphical log feature is pretty indispensable for complex projects. Eg check out this:

https://i.postimg.cc/qRb76Wxj/godot-mergy.png

This is much nicer than trying to do grok this through the cli for me. Reverting commits, cherrypicking, merges, splicing the history, seeing all the available branches, keeping track of orphaned commits etc, is all super easy

3. If I have to pick between not remembering the CLI commands off the top of my head, and having to memorise and alias a whole bunch of commands to be able to use git fully, I'll pick the former every day. Its the same reason I use an IDE

I wouldn't object to it being a standalone tool, but the nice thing about it being on the context menu is that it doesn't intrude when you don't need it

Re: WinApps: Run Windows apps as if they were a part of the native Linux OS

#99
Lol, at that point I would just run Windows...

What is the threshold where you are basically running Windows, and you have Linux installed just for some internet vanity?

Play games? Run Windows games with Wine/Proton Coding? VSCode App? This thing...

But at least I don't own Windows, sheej!

Post reply on HN