As someone who uses Mobile Linux, I am pretty excited to see this, but I can't help but wonder if this is only a "Business decision" and not necessarily Qualcomm turning over a new leaf for being FOSS friendly: - Their Snapdragon X laptop didn't do very well, and they likely realize an ARM Windows laptop will always be a second class citizen: https://www.techpowerup.com/329255/snapdragon-x-failed-qualc... . - Likewis…
it makes some sense for embedded stuff, linux is only continuing to gain ground there. are there any linux phone projects that are actively maintained and used in 2025? i was under the impression that android kinda subsumed them all.
Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
181–190 of 249 posts
Re: Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
#182let's stop being naive - qcom will not change.
Re: Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
#183As someone who uses Mobile Linux, I am pretty excited to see this, but I can't help but wonder if this is only a "Business decision" and not necessarily Qualcomm turning over a new leaf for being FOSS friendly: - Their Snapdragon X laptop didn't do very well, and they likely realize an ARM Windows laptop will always be a second class citizen: https://www.techpowerup.com/329255/snapdragon-x-failed-qualc... . - Likewis…
it makes some sense for embedded stuff, linux is only continuing to gain ground there. are there any linux phone projects that are actively maintained and used in 2025? i was under the impression that android kinda subsumed them all.
Re: Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
#184Qualcomm did this in 2024. They pushed some patches to LKML, and issued a press release to brag about it. ( https://www.qualcomm.com/developer/blog/2024/05/upstreaming-... ) Yet 2 days ago, Tuxedo Computers announced they were abandoning Qualcomm due to crap support. ( https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/26/tuxedo_axes_arm_lapto... ). In particular, the long battery runtimes – usually one of the strong arguments for…
>Yet 2 days ago, Tuxedo Computers announced they were abandoning Qualcomm due to crap support. ( Does Apple offer better support? Qualcomm offers commercial support. I guess Tuuxedo Computers didn't pay for the support?
Re: Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
#185Does that mean that one will be able to purchase tablets with this chip and replace the OS with Linux? That would be great. As far as I know, there currently are no options for lightweight tablets that support Linux. Not sure how well WSL2 on tablets work. Does anybody here have experiences with WSL2 on tablets like the new Microsoft Surface Pro that uses the Snapdragon X Elite chip?
> As far as I know, there currently are no options for lightweight tablets that support Linux. Does this count? https://puri.sm/products/librem-11
And I would want to do a normal Debian stable installation. Just like I can on a Lenovo laptop. The Librem 11 comes with their own Debian based distro and I can't find any info if I can install a normal Debian on it from scratch.
Re: Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
#186If anybody in Qualcomm leadership is reading this thread: this is a good start, and I applaud you for it. There is also a lot more to do if you're serious about growing your market penetration beyond phones. The drivers might be up on LKML, but they're not mainlined yet. And this is just gen5. It would be great if you could fix your gen4 and 4.5 drivers, so that people building products with your chips weren't stuck…
> ... Also your boot-chain is still closed and proprietary, and completely different than the one used by all other ARM vendors. Being the special snowflake is not helping your business or your customers. ... Why does the boot-chain matter? Can't we just have a custom U-Boot implementation that interacts with the bespoke boot chain while providing standard UEFI support to the rest of the system? Isn't that how Asahi…
Re: Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
#187If anybody in Qualcomm leadership is reading this thread: this is a good start, and I applaud you for it. There is also a lot more to do if you're serious about growing your market penetration beyond phones. The drivers might be up on LKML, but they're not mainlined yet. And this is just gen5. It would be great if you could fix your gen4 and 4.5 drivers, so that people building products with your chips weren't stuck…
Second best, after Apple.
This is much better than that. Not great yet, but much better than that in comparison.
Re: Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Second best, after Apple.
Apple, whose FOSS support is reliant on volunteers reverse engineering their shit? This is much better than that. Not great yet, but much better than that in comparison.
I agree Qualcomm's support of open source is better, while still leaving a lot to be desired.
Re: Same-day upstream Linux support for Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Also your boot-chain is still closed and proprietary Nowadays the entire thing until you land in EL1 needs to be signed by Qualcomm as well. This is without "Secure Boot" enabled. OEMs only get to run code under the hypervisor. And you might want to use a part of the hardware but someone decided the VM your code runs in shouldn't have access to that, too bad.
not all true. And Qualcomm taking over EL2 is optional now
EL2 is still locked down for the chip this post is about, AFAIK. And everything else is is staying locked.