Live data from Hacker News

Comic Code Reviews

jona.ca

21–30 of 37 posts

Re: Comic Code Reviews

#23

Interesting idea but unfortunately the given example comic makes very little sense. It was difficult to parse even as someone who's familiar with these concepts, and I think it will hurt more than help any newbies.

I think this kind of slop has negative value. It's unclear how much of the information in the comic is hallucinated, and the malformed code "for i = i1+|>" and nonsense text "(starts write hooks!" doesn't bode well.

Re: Comic Code Reviews

#24
If it’s an addendum then fine. But can’t replace textual review which is much easier to parse, at least for me.

BTW, amazing they chose a review that exemplifies why hooks are a horrible horrible mistake for public API.

Re: Comic Code Reviews

#27

Interesting idea but unfortunately the given example comic makes very little sense. It was difficult to parse even as someone who's familiar with these concepts, and I think it will hurt more than help any newbies.

I think this kind of slop has negative value. It's unclear how much of the information in the comic is hallucinated, and the malformed code "for i = i1+|>" and nonsense text "(starts write hooks!" doesn't bode well.

Definitely still needs a "human in the loop." I don't know if this particular comic was cherry-picked or if it was the first one generated by Nano-Banana Pro, but either way, it's still got plenty of messy typos.

  RULES OF HOORS? 
  Updste #2: setState
  Starts wite hooks!

Re: Comic Code Reviews

#28

Interesting idea but unfortunately the given example comic makes very little sense. It was difficult to parse even as someone who's familiar with these concepts, and I think it will hurt more than help any newbies.

>> the given example comic makes very little sense.

I thought that was just due to it being about React.

Post reply on HN