Live data from Hacker News

An Homage to 90s –/Public_HTML Hosting

public.monster

1–10 of 42 posts

Re: An Homage to 90s –/Public_HTML Hosting

#2
This is just a static html site, no? Using build packs or npm for a static page doesn’t even make sense. While I appreciate the throw back design, there’s nothing retro about sticking html files in the public folder; it’s just the correct way to deploy simple static pages (I’ve got a half dozen sites deployed exactly in that way).

Re: An Homage to 90s –/Public_HTML Hosting

#7
What has changed now? I still upload my static web content to my ~/public_html folder on live website, using sftp. Anything wrong with that? Why people coming up with this kind of news? The other day someone was saying scripting the HTML Table element using DOM API is gone.

Check internic.net landing page. Not changed in decades. You don't need to be so desperate for change.

Re: An Homage to 90s –/Public_HTML Hosting

#9
post #7

What has changed now? I still upload my static web content to my ~/public_html folder on live website, using sftp. Anything wrong with that? Why people coming up with this kind of news? The other day someone was saying scripting the HTML Table element using DOM API is gone. Check internic.net landing page. Not changed in decades. You don't need to be so desperate for change.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN