Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
41–50 of 106 posts
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#42Todays game of was it AI generated? > The compact size of the Mac mini, which packs a powerful System on a Chip (SoC) into a tiny footprint.The energy efficiency of Apple silicon (M-series) chips, which allows high density without overheating or excessive power draw. This really adds nothing to the article, and looks like AI fluff to me. Combine that with there being a bold section in like every single paragraph, I'm…
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#43Unlike the old rack mount options for the trashcan Mac Pro units (eg https://photos.imgix.com/racking-mac-pros ), it doesn't seem like much thought has been given here to a front-to-back airflow. I'm also surprised they're touting the density of this solution— seems like the obvious thing would be to put the Minis on their sides. A 4U chassis has 17.5cm vertical space in it, and a Mac Mini is 17cm wide. With the Mini…
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#44Todays game of was it AI generated? > The compact size of the Mac mini, which packs a powerful System on a Chip (SoC) into a tiny footprint.The energy efficiency of Apple silicon (M-series) chips, which allows high density without overheating or excessive power draw. This really adds nothing to the article, and looks like AI fluff to me. Combine that with there being a bold section in like every single paragraph, I'm…
The thing that got me was always referring to Scaleway in the third person. e.g. this read like the response I get when I ask AI to review code: > Scaleway’s solution to that problem was ingenious: embedding a Raspberry Pi module with each Mac mini. (I realize this may be an artifact of a corporate style guide, but I'd much prefer "Our solution to that problem was embedding . . ." Both because the "was ingenious" doe…
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#45Are they powering them with USB-C? I didn't think that was possible/supported.
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#46Unlike the old rack mount options for the trashcan Mac Pro units (eg https://photos.imgix.com/racking-mac-pros ), it doesn't seem like much thought has been given here to a front-to-back airflow. I'm also surprised they're touting the density of this solution— seems like the obvious thing would be to put the Minis on their sides. A 4U chassis has 17.5cm vertical space in it, and a Mac Mini is 17cm wide. With the Mini…
https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/687e650a56916806eaaf8f62/...
You can find a bunch more detail in their related patent filings:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20240397658A1/en?q=(%22m...
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#47What do people use mac servers for?
20 years ago the company I worked for used a Mac-Mini for video transcoding, because there was some DRM issue we had to deal with, I don't remember the specifics.
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#48What do people use mac servers for?
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#49We also have a video of how we built the (then-M1) infra at GitHub: https://youtu.be/I2J2MzKjcqY?si=piMVam3qUpJGeW9Q With 60 minis per rack, and custom sled cases.
Re: Scaleway turns Mac Minis into high‑density, Raspberry Pi–managed servers
#50I was interested in provisioning one of these a few months back through Scaleway, but couldn't navigate their sign-up process without it dumping me back to the start everytime. Nor did I receive a reply when I e-mailed their support e-mail. I don't know if that's changed (they had odd pricing too, like Startup vs. Business, of which the difference wasn't clear), but aware. I hope someone has more success than I did.