Live data from Hacker News

Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

creolened.com

31–40 of 203 posts

Re: Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

#31
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is, strictly going by looks, one of Microsoft's ugliest UIs. I will never understand how people tolerate it, let alone defend it publicly. Shameful, absolutely and thoroughly shameful!

It was the style at the time. There are a lot of programs from that era with stupid, oversized nothing standard ui's, windows xp was a study in restraint compared to many applications. I think computers had just gotten powerful enough to have large bitmaps in the ui and the designers got a little crazy with their newfound power, as they tend to do. Our "modern" superflat look is probably the remnants of a reflexive r…

Yes and no. XP’s default theme was hideous even at the time. The silver was fine as was the olive, but that blue was horrible.

It was a product of its time, though. This was also the time of media players that used entirely custom skinning and mostly looked terrible (at least in retrospect).

Re: Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

#32
I'm surprised nobody caught this, but both the screenshot for Windows 8.1 is not Windows 8.1, it's Windows Threshold, the development phase of Windows 10.

The specific screenshot they show is the very first start menu they cobbled together for Threshold, which would later be redesigned again before shipping as Windows 10. The screenshot is also showing off early adaptations of Windows 8 apps running in movable windows -- before that, they could only run full- or split-screen!

Re: Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

#33
post #11
post #7

To me personally, it feels like Windows 2000 was the last and maybe only consistent UI onto which all later versions bolted what they considered improvements without ever overhauling the UI in full.

Windows 8 was a pretty big overhaul. But I agree with the author it was a most unwelcome overhaul.

Yeah, but many of its 'advanced' settings and such still pop-up windows 95-styled interfaces. And these are actually the most user-friendly parts of the OS.

Re: Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

#34
post #22

I still consider Windows 2000's UI to be the peak of computer interfaces and nothing else has come close to its effectiveness and clarity for day to day work.

Coming from 98/ME, Windows 2000 was utterly magic. It such a stable operating system compared to what came before it. Supposedly it was less compatible than 98/ME for games and other applications but in my experience this wasn’t true.

Looks were fine. Functionality was such a step up.

Re: Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

#36
post #7

To me personally, it feels like Windows 2000 was the last and maybe only consistent UI onto which all later versions bolted what they considered improvements without ever overhauling the UI in full.

I think Windows XP did a pretty good job for the home market, making Windows appear friendly and easy to use to a wide audience (and without too many style inconstistencies).

Moreover, Windows XP let you switch the interface back to the classic 9x look, if you wanted a more serious appearance, and better performance.

Re: Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

#37
post #9

8 for Windows 11? An OS that includes ads in the Start menu, made with React. I'm not even mentioning right-click, which has basically two views: you open it and see some uselessly chosen tools, and you still need to open the old version (with the old design, breaking design consistency) to access actually useful things. Viva Windows XP!

But this article is only grading the styling of the OS GUI elements, not the functionality (or lack thereof) of the OS itself.

Windows 11 is far from the best at that though.

It doesn’t even look good.

I know taste is subjective, but a better comparison is the contemporaries of the time or at least taking a step back to consider the entire aesthetic.

If so, ironically, I think Vista should win.

Re: Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

#39
post #29

I like the “did it improve or regress” angle. I hope it’s not controversial if I say that in the Apple world, Liquid Glass is, if not the first, certainly the worst regression. And I think this could have been predicted if you agreee with OP about Vista.

Liquid Glass is such a horrible regression. I'm holding onto my Sequoia for the time being (and maybe I'll then switch to Linux).

I think the best version of macOS was High Sierra. After that, everything started becoming bloated and inconsistent.

Re: Windows GUI – Good, Bad and Pretty Ugly (2023)

#40
post #9

8 for Windows 11? An OS that includes ads in the Start menu, made with React. I'm not even mentioning right-click, which has basically two views: you open it and see some uselessly chosen tools, and you still need to open the old version (with the old design, breaking design consistency) to access actually useful things. Viva Windows XP!

But this article is only grading the styling of the OS GUI elements, not the functionality (or lack thereof) of the OS itself.

Fair point, but the article praises Windows 11 for "cohesion" while the right-click menu literally has two different visual styles, and many system apps still use old UI. Even judging purely on aesthetics, that's inconsistent.
Post reply on HN