Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
oneusefulthing.org
Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
1–10 of 336 posts
Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#2Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#3[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/alphabet-just-blew-past-expec...
Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#4Google's advancement is not just in software, it is also in hardware. They use their own hardware for training as well as inferencing [1]. [1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/alphabet-just-blew-past-expec...
Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#5I am curious what the user interfaces of AI in the future will be, I think whoever can crack that will create immense value.
Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#6Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#7It is interesting that most of our modes of interaction with AI is still just textboxes. The only big UX change in that the last three years has been the introduction of the Claude Code / OpenAI Codex tools. They feel amazing to use, like you're working with another independent mind. I am curious what the user interfaces of AI in the future will be, I think whoever can crack that will create immense value.
Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#8It is interesting that most of our modes of interaction with AI is still just textboxes. The only big UX change in that the last three years has been the introduction of the Claude Code / OpenAI Codex tools. They feel amazing to use, like you're working with another independent mind. I am curious what the user interfaces of AI in the future will be, I think whoever can crack that will create immense value.
ChatGPT's voice is absolutely amazing and I prefer it to text for brainstorming.
Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#9I feel like I've been hearing this for at least 1.5 years at this point (since the launch of GPT 4/Claude 3). I certainly agree we've been heading in this direction but when will this become unambiguously true rather than a phrase people say?
Re: Three Years from GPT-3 to Gemini 3
#10> But it suggests that “human in the loop” is evolving from “human who fixes AI mistakes” to “human who directs AI work.” And that may be the biggest change since the release of ChatGPT. I feel like I've been hearing this for at least 1.5 years at this point (since the launch of GPT 4/Claude 3). I certainly agree we've been heading in this direction but when will this become unambiguously true rather than a phrase pe…