Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not the USA outsourcing rage, it is foreign actors paying to manufacture rage in the USA.
While a handful troll factories are paid to destabilize USA, vast majority operate from 3rd world countries with only profit in mind.
X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
131–140 of 328 posts
Re: X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not the USA outsourcing rage, it is foreign actors paying to manufacture rage in the USA.
whynotboth.gif I'd make the assumption that posters located in Russia, China, NK, etc. are likely to be in some way tied to the state, where posters in India, random African nations, etc. are more likely to be private actors of which some will be US-based outsourcing to low-cost labor.
Re: X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
#133People will read all kinds of political implications into this but IMO it reflects something simpler and perhaps more damning for X: that paying users for the engagement their posts make is a fundamentally bad idea. If you’re looking to make some money on X you want engagement. If you want engagement you want to say controversial things people will argue about. What better than right wing US politics, especially when…
Which for many enterprising trolls/grifter have seen them become SEO(TEO?) experts to push their preferred narratives for clout/profit while drowning the entire timelines in a flood of noise.
Re: X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
#134Re: X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
> My main use case is to get up-to-date news on things that mainstream media doesn't cover accurately. Or hasn't covered yet . It's interesting to watch the cycle of "shows up on social media" then "shows up in industry-specific press" then "shows up in mainstream press", with lag in each step. These days, Fediverse is providing the same thing for some industries. You see stuff show up there first, then show up on X…
I think that almost every platform has gone through a period where the latest breaking news was being published.. as it happened IRC Usenet Reddit Facebook (live) Twitter
Re: X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
#136Re: X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
#137X obviously isn't the only platform where this is taking place and it is curious as to why they rolled it back. how open are you to a US citizen verified town square online? You'd have to scan your passport or driver license to post memes and stuff.
I'm not really surprised it was rolled back given Musks political leanings. I am surprised it was even added in the first place though, surely this outcome was obvious?
Re: X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
#138Re: X's new country-of-origin feature reveals many 'US' accounts to be foreign-run
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The network was small: just 49 Facebook accounts, 85 Instagram accounts and 71 Twitter accounts in question. This is the pattern with all Russian influence operations; they’re always implied to be ominously large and end up being laughably small. American political polarization had nothing to do with the Russians; this is just the refrain of frustrated Democrats who refuse to acknowledge the consequences of ill-con…
This sounds like being wilfully uninformed. Russia organized almost a dozen Black Lives Matter protests, one of them attended by Michael Moore. They ran about half of the largest US identity focused Facebook groups (Christian/Black/etc) during the 2020 US election. I gave you one small example, it's on you to look for the full picture rather than jump to an erroneous conclusion based on god knows what motivations. Th…
Can you provide any citation for this and the approximate date when this was revealed? I’ve been hearing about this since 2015 and the last report I looked at was entirely unconvincing.
> it's also about stoking ethnic and religious tension to try to weaken the US and destroy its ability to be a unified cohesive country.
That is likely one of Russia’s goals; it is not likely that the Russians were the origin of these political cleavages. This was the problem with the entire Russian influence narrative; it was a post-hoc rationalization for why exceptionally bad ideas like diversity and multiculturalism were rejected by a subset of the population. In essence: “If they hadn’t been exposed to these Facebook posts, they never would have had these illiberal ideas put into their heads.”
It was also impossible to take seriously because most of the elected officials promoting it were receiving campaign contributions from AIPAC.