Oh Well, I left gmail years ago, now it is used for junk mail, good luck loading ads going to gmail into your AI :)
What did you move too? I was thinking of moving my personal email off of Gmail for a while. It's just 15+ years of accounts to untangle. I long made a "spam/unimportant site verification " account, so that's set.
Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
51–60 of 61 posts
Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
My own domain.
Assumedly you need an email hosting service to place behind your domain, correct? Or do you self host an email server? If you are completely self-hosting, how do you deal with being marked as spam by large spam filter organizations for being a low-trust sender?
But as long as you get SSL/DKIM/SPF and the other stuff right, and it's not THAT difficult, then most hosters will let you through. Unless it's German Telecom, because for some reason t-online.de decided to only allow emails from hosters they whitelisted and there's a whole approval process which even requires registering with them with an email that is NOT from your domain and even a fax, but honestly fuck anyone using that domain.
Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#53The article is useful overall, but the following line is such bad journalism that I want to call it out, since we can't afford to have people dumbed-down. > The reason behind this is Google’s push to power new Gmail features with its Gemini AI, helping you write emails faster and manage your inbox more efficiently.
Alright, I see that line, but in what sense is that bad journalism? I could in the same vein call this out as a bad comment.
Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#54Google can read the emails of everyone who corresponds with a Gmail user - which is almost everyone - and they can't opt out.
One could use encryption but most receiving users have not the faintest clue on how to use that. If most people would care, then I wouldn't give a flying fuck about what Google does because they can't read my mail even if they wanted to.
1. Encrypted email only protects the email body. All the metadata - who is emailing who, when, from what servers - as well as the subject line, are in the clear regardless. The metadata is more valuable than the data in many cases.
2. Unless users download all their Gmail messages, leaving none on the server (essentially, like an old POP account), then the decrypted message bodies will be in their Gmail account for Google to read.
Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Alright, I see that line, but in what sense is that bad journalism? I could in the same vein call this out as a bad comment.
A journalist is stating a corporate PR explanation for a sketchy action as fact. And it's not even a very believable reason, at least not completely, and the journalist certainly isn't verifying it. And it's important.
Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#56Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#57They're already reading your email to train their ads, so a small step to also train the AI right?
Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#58Link for the lazy: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#settings/general Find "Smart Features", uncheck, and press save, which will reload Gmail. Then find "Google Workspace smart features" and click the "Manage Workspace smart features settings" button and unselect everything.
For me this feature has been disabled for as long as I remember it being there. I think it predates the AI craze by quite some time.
Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#59Reading comprehension and media literacy at all-time lows, below what cognitive scientists formerly believed was a hard floor of "absolute zero comprehension".
Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
A journalist is stating a corporate PR explanation for a sketchy action as fact. And it's not even a very believable reason, at least not completely, and the journalist certainly isn't verifying it. And it's important.
But journalists have to include the statements from both sides. And then it's up to the audience to make an opinion of it.