Live data from Hacker News

Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

malwarebytes.com

41–50 of 61 posts

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#41

Link for the lazy: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#settings/general Find "Smart Features", uncheck, and press save, which will reload Gmail. Then find "Google Workspace smart features" and click the "Manage Workspace smart features settings" button and unselect everything.

For me this feature has been disabled for as long as I remember it being there. I think it predates the AI craze by quite some time.

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#42

From the dialogues in the pictures it doesn’t sound like they are using anyones emails for training. The messaging indicates it’s more like using as context and/or generating embeddings for RAG. Unless there’s something else I’m not aware of. I know that Google does a lot of bad stuff but we don’t need to make up stuff they just aren’t doing This doomsday messaging an alarmism is only serves to degrade the whole caus…

i don't understand one thing - isn't the Venn Diagram of people who use Gmail in 2025 and who are on HN just 2 circles that don't touch?

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#43
post #34
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep I went through this sad journey with my gmail this week. Got tired of seeing "coming soon" packages cluttering up my inbox, so I looked into how to turn them off. It turned off the categories. Reminds me of the dark pattern used by many apps, where if you turn off notifications to avoid ads/spam, you also lose useful notifications.

There's an entire setting for "Turn on package tracking" alone. You do not need to disable Smart Features altogether.

I never enabled that and I verified it's not enabled. However I still have the "Happening Soon" section in my inbox that has status of some packages.

My guess is that Smart Features will (along with everything else it does) scan your emails to populate "Happening Soon" with package status, and if you then enable "Turn on package tracking", it will also periodically poll the shippers for those packages to keep the status up to date.

My complaint still stands. I want to entirely remove "Happening Soon" without disabling categories. It's not even the "Google reading your emails" creepiness. I just don't want my UI to be cluttered.

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#44
post #43
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's an entire setting for "Turn on package tracking" alone. You do not need to disable Smart Features altogether.

I never enabled that and I verified it's not enabled. However I still have the "Happening Soon" section in my inbox that has status of some packages. My guess is that Smart Features will (along with everything else it does) scan your emails to populate "Happening Soon" with package status, and if you then enable "Turn on package tracking", it will also periodically poll the shippers for those packages to keep the sta…

I see. The "Happening Soon" section of the inbox is populated with stuff other than order tracking, such as your airline tickets. So I can see why you'd have to disable the whole shooting match to get rid of it. But I agree that it would be nice for some people if there was an inbox layout setting to just get rid of it altogether.

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#45
post #6

They're claiming that these options allow Google to use your data to train its AI, but that's not what it says at all. Where are they getting that idea from?

"training on our data" has turned into a catchphrase like "taking our guns" or "banning our books" - dumb propaganda for anti-AI crowd to enrage people. Whether personalized AI-based experience is useful can be debated but everything has to be twisted into culture wars, thats just how media is nowadays

Privacy is not a culture war issue. Not wanting massive amounts of personal data hoovered up to train an AI for Google is reasonable. Arguing against this kind of invasion of privacy is not "dumb propaganda".

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#46
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What did you move too? I was thinking of moving my personal email off of Gmail for a while. It's just 15+ years of accounts to untangle. I long made a "spam/unimportant site verification " account, so that's set.

My own domain.

Assumedly you need an email hosting service to place behind your domain, correct? Or do you self host an email server? If you are completely self-hosting, how do you deal with being marked as spam by large spam filter organizations for being a low-trust sender?

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#47
post #8

Oh Well, I left gmail years ago, now it is used for junk mail, good luck loading ads going to gmail into your AI :)

What did you move too? I was thinking of moving my personal email off of Gmail for a while. It's just 15+ years of accounts to untangle. I long made a "spam/unimportant site verification " account, so that's set.

I like Fastmail with my own domain for personal email, but the reality is nothing is a complete replacement for a Google account, given how tied in it is with auth and the whole Google ecosystem. I still have to use Google for work.

Proton is another one people often suggest. Hey.com sometimes too. No experience with those myself.

There are other options (such as the big guys, iCloud mail or Outlook.com), but aside from self-hosting (which I don't want to spend time maintaining just for my personal mail), I personally haven't seen much outside of those ones that are recommended often.

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#48

From the dialogues in the pictures it doesn’t sound like they are using anyones emails for training. The messaging indicates it’s more like using as context and/or generating embeddings for RAG. Unless there’s something else I’m not aware of. I know that Google does a lot of bad stuff but we don’t need to make up stuff they just aren’t doing This doomsday messaging an alarmism is only serves to degrade the whole caus…

Sorry, but that "doomsday" "alarmism" is exactly what is needed and warranted. But this practice of sneakily opting users in into things they don't want instead of a very clear full on pop up saying "We now use your data and private emails for AI training" is exactly the problem.

> I know that Google does a lot of bad stuff but we don’t need to make up stuff they just aren’t doing

No no. a) they ARE doing a lot of bad stuff and b) that shit ain't made up and they ARE exactly doing that. Or do you also think that Github is NOT using priI know that Google does a lot of bad stuff but we don’t need to make up stuff they just aren’t doingvate repos to train Copilot? Do you honestly and truly believe that?

If you do truly believe that I got a bunch of bridges to sell to you.

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#49
post #3

Google can read the emails of everyone who corresponds with a Gmail user - which is almost everyone - and they can't opt out.

One could use encryption but most receiving users have not the faintest clue on how to use that. If most people would care, then I wouldn't give a flying fuck about what Google does because they can't read my mail even if they wanted to.

Re: Gmail can read your emails and attachments to train its AI, unless you opt out

#50
post #13

The article is useful overall, but the following line is such bad journalism that I want to call it out, since we can't afford to have people dumbed-down. > The reason behind this is Google’s push to power new Gmail features with its Gemini AI, helping you write emails faster and manage your inbox more efficiently.

Alright, I see that line, but in what sense is that bad journalism? I could in the same vein call this out as a bad comment.
Post reply on HN