Live data from Hacker News

Google Antigravity

antigravity.google

761–770 of 1001 posts

Re: Google Antigravity

#761
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After a bunch of people leave the company it's already like nobody knows how anything is built. This seems like a good thing to accelerate understanding a codebase.

Agents pretty good at describing how a particular feature works. It's not as dire as you make it seem.

that's what i mean

Re: Google Antigravity

#762

I gave it a fair shot. It is a vs code fork. There were some UI glitches. Some usability was better. Cursor has some real annoying usability issues - like their previous/next code change never going away and no way to disable it. Design of this one looks more polished and less muddy. I was working on a project and just continued with it. It was easy because they import setting from cursor. Feels like the browser wars…

>no ambition

Sounds like the modus operandi of most large tech companies these days. If you exclude Valve.

Re: Google Antigravity

#764

Earlier quoted context omitted.

- don't learn from what you tell them - don't have career growth that you can feel good about having contributed to - don't have a genuine interest in accomplishment or team goals - have no past and no future. When you change companies, they won't recognize you in the hall. - no ownership over results. If they make a mistake, they won't suffer.

- don't learn from what you tell them We'll fix that, eventually. - don't have career growth that you can feel good about having contributed to Humans are on the verge of building machines that are smarter than we are. I feel pretty goddamned awesome about that. It's what we're supposed to be doing. - don't have a genuine interest in accomplishment or team goals Easy to train for, if it turns out to be necessary. I'd…

> It's what we're supposed to be doing.

Why?

Re: Google Antigravity

#765
post #571
post #478

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Electron apps will win because they're just web apps - and web apps won so decisively years ago that they will never go anywhere.

No. Electron apps won, not web apps. There's a huge difference.

[deleted]

Re: Google Antigravity

#766

I gave it a fair shot. It is a vs code fork. There were some UI glitches. Some usability was better. Cursor has some real annoying usability issues - like their previous/next code change never going away and no way to disable it. Design of this one looks more polished and less muddy. I was working on a project and just continued with it. It was easy because they import setting from cursor. Feels like the browser wars…

> Cursor has some real annoying usability issues - like their previous/next code change never going away and no way to disable it.

The state of Cursor "review" features make me convinced that the cursor devs themselves are not dogfooding their own product.

It drives me crazy when hundreds of changes build up, I've already reviewed and committed everything, but I still have all these "pending changes to review".

Ideally committing a change should treat it as accepted. At the very least, there needs to be a way to globally "accept all".

Re: Google Antigravity

#767

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I logged into Gemini yesterday for the first time in ages. Made one image and then it said I was out of credits. I complained to it that I had only made one image. It decided to make me one more! Then told me I was out of credits again.

> I complained to it that I had only made one image. It decided to make me one more! What?! So was it only hallucinating that you were out of credits the first time?

More likely the credits system runs on eventual consistency, and he hit a different backend.

Re: Google Antigravity

#768

Earlier quoted context omitted.

15 years ago, every company had its own "BlahBlah Studio" IDE built on top of Eclipse. Now it's VSCode. Meanwhile, JetBrains IDEs are still the best, but remain unpopular outside of Android Studio.

> remain unpopular outside of Android Studio What a strange claim. For enterprise Java, is there is a serious alternative in 2025? And, Rider is slowly eating the lunch of (classic) Visual Studio for C# development. I used it again recently to write an Excel XLL plug-in. I could not believe how far Rider has come in 10 years.

Oh, sure. I've been using IntelliJ since 2003. But compare the number of C# developers and the number of JS developers.

In my current company, only I am using IntelliJ IDEs. Other people have never even tried them, except for Android Studio.

Re: Google Antigravity

#769

On the pricing page it says that for public preview they are offering a free individual plan with "generous rate limits". I gave it an HTML file and asked it to create Jinja templates from it and 2 minutes later (still planning, no additional prompt) I got this: > Model quota limit exceeded. You have reached the quota limit for this model.

If you dismiss and respond something like "proceed" it resumes. Takes a fair while to actually run out of usage.

Re: Google Antigravity

#770

> Spin up agents to tackle routine tasks that take you out of your flow, such as codebase research, bug fixes, and backlog tasks. The software of the future, where nobody on staff knows how anything is built, no one understands why anything breaks, and cruft multiplies exponentially. But at least we're not taken out of our flow!

Vibe code fixer seems to be a viable job soon
Post reply on HN