Live data from Hacker News

Google Antigravity

antigravity.google

81–90 of 1001 posts

Re: Google Antigravity

#81
I don't want to hate on this but I remember last week, when as a backend developer doing frontend, I spent about 20 minutes prompting Claude Sonnet in a loop trying to build a landing page for a new feature.

The task was to put create a header, putting the company logo in the corner and the text in the middle.

The resulting CSS was an abomination - I threw it all away and rewrote it from scratch (using my somewhat anemic CSS knowledge), ending up with like 3 selectors with like 20 lines of styles in total.

This made me think that 1: CSS and the way we do UI sucks, I still don't get why don't we have a graphical editor that can at least do the simple stuff well. 2: when these model's don't wanna do what you want them to the way you want them, they really don't wanna.

I think AI has shown us there's a need for a new generation of simple to write software and libraries, where translating your intent into actual code is much simpler and the tools actually help you work instead of barely allowing to fight be all the accidental complexity.

We were much closer to this reality back in the 90s when you opened up a drag and drop UI editor (like VB6, Borland Delphi, Flash), wrote some glue code and out came an .exe that you could just give to people.

Somewhere along the way, the cool kids came up with the idea that GUIs are bad, and everything needs to go through the command line.

Nowadays I need a shell script that configures my typescript CDK template (with its own NPM repo), that deploys the backend infra (which is bundled via node), the database schema, compiles the frontend, and puts the code into the right places, and hope to god that I don't run into all sorts of weird security errors because I didn't configure the security the way the browser/AWS/security middleware wanted to.

Re: Google Antigravity

#82

> Spin up agents to tackle routine tasks that take you out of your flow, such as codebase research, bug fixes, and backlog tasks. The software of the future, where nobody on staff knows how anything is built, no one understands why anything breaks, and cruft multiplies exponentially. But at least we're not taken out of our flow!

If you're building something new you'll need some skilled people around

Re: Google Antigravity

#84

If I use this does it mean Google has access to all my code and it may popup as"AI generated" in someone else's code?

That's not quite how LLMs work.

Not but you can be quite sure somewhere deep inside the TOS there is a line saying their telemetry swallow your soul. If not, it will be added. It's google, that's what they do.

Re: Google Antigravity

#85
post #46

> Bajillions of dollars invested in the development of some of the most powerful computational artifacts to date. > Fork VS Code, add a few workflow / management ideas on top. > "Agentic development platform" I'm Jack's depressed lack of surprise. Please someone, make me feel something with software again.

There is cool stuff out there! Look beyond the companies with $B valuations and you can find smart, passionate people making neat stuff.

Re: Google Antigravity

#86

> Spin up agents to tackle routine tasks that take you out of your flow, such as codebase research, bug fixes, and backlog tasks. The software of the future, where nobody on staff knows how anything is built, no one understands why anything breaks, and cruft multiplies exponentially. But at least we're not taken out of our flow!

After a bunch of people leave the company it's already like nobody knows how anything is built. This seems like a good thing to accelerate understanding a codebase.

Re: Google Antigravity

#87
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> html Would be willing to bet this is the issue. Adding html files to context for gemini models results in a ton of token use.

why? EDIT: why must users care?

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/regex-match-open...
Post reply on HN