Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
1–10 of 188 posts
Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#2Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#3I barely want to live another day of life at the age of 36 :/
Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#4Take, for instance, Harvoni -- a drug introduced in late 2014 which cures Hepatitis C following a single course of treatment. It has done something like $100B in revenue for Gilead Biosciences, and, minimally, earned them $7-10B in profit. (Possibly much more than that.) Its pricing was scandalous, but that's not the issue here; the point is that it was unequivocally one of the most profitable drug launches in history.
Sure, the eradication of Hep C might make it "unsustainable" -- but it's not as though there's a lack of other diseases or maladies to contend with. Take the profits and plant new seeds, buy new technologies, develop new drugs. Besides, the research and development of new drugs has never been a stable business model, and never truly sustainable off one discovery, on account of patent expiry terms, generic competition, etc.
Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#5But not here. Someone's gotta make mad bank off of every aspect of this shit here.
Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#6The report-writer must have been from Goldman Sachs' B-team. It takes five minutes to turn up ample evidence which demonstrates that curing patients can be extremely profitable. Take, for instance, Harvoni -- a drug introduced in late 2014 which cures Hepatitis C following a single course of treatment. It has done something like $100B in revenue for Gilead Biosciences, and, minimally, earned them $7-10B in profit. (P…
So if the pricing hadn't been "scandalous" by your definition, would it still have been profitable? You do realize that the profits are there because of the pricing, right?
Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#7Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#8The report-writer must have been from Goldman Sachs' B-team. It takes five minutes to turn up ample evidence which demonstrates that curing patients can be extremely profitable. Take, for instance, Harvoni -- a drug introduced in late 2014 which cures Hepatitis C following a single course of treatment. It has done something like $100B in revenue for Gilead Biosciences, and, minimally, earned them $7-10B in profit. (P…
Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#9Re: Goldman Sachs asks in biotech Report: Is curing patients a sustainable business? (2018)
#10It doesn’t matter if it is a sustainable business. People will do what they can to maximize their income now. If 10 companies are withholding a cure to milk the patients, any one of them can break from that strategy at any time, with near-instant financial reward and competitive advantage. It is not a stable equilibrium.