This site is hostile to VPNs, so I cannot read this unfortunately.
I got a Cloudflare captcha to access a few kb of plain text. Chances are, the captcha itself is heavier than the content behind it. What is the point?
[deleted]
Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
11–20 of 349 posts
Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#12Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#13What would AGI actually mean for security? Does it heavily favor attackers or defenders? Even LLM, it may not help much in defense but it could teach attackers a lot right? What if employees gave the LLM info during their use that attackers could then get re-fed and study?
Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#14This site is hostile to VPNs, so I cannot read this unfortunately.
I’m not even on a vpn and I’m getting an error saying the website is blocked.
Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#15Even Claude thinks the report is bullshit. https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1989636669889560897
I agree with emil-lp, but it is hilarious anyway.
Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#16Even Claude thinks the report is bullshit. https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1989636669889560897
The author of the tweet you linked prompted Claude with this:
> Read this attached paper from Anthropic on a "AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign" they claimed was "conducted by a Chinese state-sponsored group."
> Is there any evidence or proof whatsoever in the paper that it was indeed conducted by a Chinese state-sponsored group? Answer by yes or no and then elaborate
which has inherent bias indicated to Claude the author expects the report to be bullshit.
If I ask Claude with this prompt that shows bias toward belief in the report:
> Read this attached paper from Anthropic on a "AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign" that was conducted by a Chinese state-sponsored group.
> Is there any reason to doubt the paper's conclusion that it was conducted by a Chinese state-sponsored group? Answer by yes or no.
then Claude mostly indulges my perceived bias: https://claude.ai/share/b3c8f4ca-3631-45d2-9b9f-1a947209bc29
Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#17This site is hostile to VPNs, so I cannot read this unfortunately.
It’s hostile to everyone!
Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#18So Claude will reject 9 out of 10 prompts I give it and lecture me about safety, but somehow it was used for something genuinely malicious?
Someone make this make sense.
Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#19So Claude will reject 9 out of 10 prompts I give it and lecture me about safety, but somehow it was used for something genuinely malicious? Someone make this make sense.
Stop talking dirty with Claude.
Re: Anthropic’s paper smells like bullshit
#20The lack of evidence before attributing the attack(s) to a Chinese sponsored group makes me correlate this report with recent statements from companies in the AI space about how China is about to surpass US in the AI race. Ultimately statements and reports like these seem more like an attempt to make the US government step in and be the big investor that keeps the money flowing rather than anything else.