Live data from Hacker News

I don’t need a Steam Machine

brainbaking.com

11–20 of 283 posts

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#11
I have been trying for a long time to find a way to play my PC games from my couch without dragging my desktop into the living room.

Steam Link works okay but is still noticeable for some games. Docking a Steam Deck wasn’t powerful enough. Running a long HDMI cable isn’t feasible in my current living space. So I’m very intrigued to have this lower powered cube sit under my TV for when I just want to do some couch co-op or play something more casual to wind down at night.

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#12
Steam Machines can become an existencial crisis for PlayStation and Xbox.

A “console” that I can use as a PC? I am in 100%. You’ll get the world biggest game library at a discount, this is why I sold my PlayStation after spending 200 euros and watching it becoming useless.

I also suspect a lot of game devs will optimize for steam machine and finally we’ll get a console like experience on PC.

Don’t let the “low specs” fool you, it has the same specs or better as 70% of steam users.

Given Valve gave money to a lot of open source maintainers , it’s also great for Linux.

Just take my money

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#13
I'm also one of those people who does everything on my mac laptop, but hits a kvm switch to jump onto a PC to play games at night (when I have time, which I don't). At this point I've stopped pretending that I want a PC that I can upgrade and swap out parts. I just want a little box that doesn't make any noise and works as is. Framework desktop and now this steam machine look like good options. I'm a bit disappointed at the 8gb gpu though.

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#14
I don't understand the "You can’t buy this without buying the Steam Controller." bit. If you want one, great, if not, it's no more necessary than with any other PC.

I've been gaming for ~40 years without ever touching a controller, why would I start now?

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#15
Kudos to the author. I also will not buy a steam Box. But i appreciate the effect it will have on gaming and Linux. I use Mint and use steam to play my games just fine. For some games it is a little bit shaky. Game company’s now have a incentive to make gaming just feel right on a Linux machine much more than like the switch deck. Just my thinking of course

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#16
It's the same as the steam deck: I don't enjoy video games anymore, I've actually never really enjoyed gaming except for a handful of titles. But I'll be damned, I love that Valve is bringing gaming to Linux and I'll buy the hardware just to support the cause. The people in my life that have been using the "I need Windows for my games" reason (or excuse ;)) to not switch to Linux are now slowly but surely leaving Windows!

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#17
post #12

Steam Machines can become an existencial crisis for PlayStation and Xbox. A “console” that I can use as a PC? I am in 100%. You’ll get the world biggest game library at a discount, this is why I sold my PlayStation after spending 200 euros and watching it becoming useless. I also suspect a lot of game devs will optimize for steam machine and finally we’ll get a console like experience on PC. Don’t let the “low specs”…

Then sony produce ps only exclusive s. No pc ports anymore.

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#18
The Steam Machine is "just" a normal Linux PC, with good integration.

The point is the target demographics. And, just like the Steam Deck, this is not something for power users. Most people on here know how to build a PC and install Linux with KDE on it, which is the same experience you would get with a Steam Machine.

Valve is selling this to an audience of gamers, specifically those who want an easy gaming experience on low end hardware. This is the same demographic which Sony and Microsoft are selling to.

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#19
I was kind of annoyed at the blog post for being kind of pointless until the last line, which cracked me up.

The Steam Machine is surely meant to be somewhere between mainstream and niche. It’s going to be cheap enough to be a pretty good deal for what it is, but I think those who are already PC builders (at least, those who aren’t unusually high-income and will toss money at a novelty) might not jump on it.

The device does offer some unique features you can’t get on the PC market like HDMI-CEC, which will make it a great living room box.

Perhaps it’s even being somewhat underrated as a PC on your desk type of solution. Perhaps the type of person who wants a small form factor plug and play solution at their desk and isn’t a small form factor expert would want it. The only barrier there is that SteamOS doesn’t bring you to desktop mode instantly, but in that case the user could install their own OS like Bazzite or Windows.

Re: I don’t need a Steam Machine

#20
post #14

I don't understand the "You can’t buy this without buying the Steam Controller." bit. If you want one, great, if not, it's no more necessary than with any other PC. I've been gaming for ~40 years without ever touching a controller, why would I start now?

Because people on the internet will call you a fake gamer if you don't play souls like games and those are best experienced on a controller?
Post reply on HN