Live data from Hacker News

Kubernetes Ingress Nginx is retiring

kubernetes.dev

41–50 of 178 posts

Re: Kubernetes Ingress Nginx is retiring

#41
post #22
post #19

How do you people even keep up with this? I'm going back to cybersecurity after trying DevOps for a year, it's not for me. I miss my sysadmin days, things were simple back then and worked. Maybe I'm just getting old and my cognitive abilities are declining. It seems to me that the current tech scene doesn't reward simple.

> It seems to me that the current tech scene doesn't reward simple. A deal with the devil was made. The C suite gets to tell a story that k8s practices let you suck every penny out of the compute you already paid for. Modern devs get to do constant busy work adding complexity everywhere, creating job security and opportunities to use fun new toys. "Here's how we're using AI to right size our pods! Never mind the actu…

This just seems like sensationalist nonsense spoken by someone who hasn’t done a second of Ops work.

Kubernetes is incredibly reliable compared to traditional infrastructure. It eliminates a ton of the configuration management dependency hellscape and inconsistent application deployments that traditional infrastructure entails.

Immutable containers provide a major benefit to development velocity and deployment reliability. They are far faster to pull and start than deploying to VMs, which end up needing some kind of annoying deployment pipeline involving building images or having some kind of complex and failure-prone deployment system.

Does Kubernetes have its downsides? Yeah, it’s complex overkill for small deployments or monolithic applications. But to be honest, there’s a lot of complexity to configuration management on traditional VMs with a lot of bad, not-so-gracefully aging tooling (cough…Chef Software)

And who is really working for a company that has a small deployment? I’d say that most medium-sized tech companies can easily justify the complexity of running a kubernetes cluster.

Networking can be complex with Kubernetes, but it’s only as complex as your service architecture.

These days there are more solutions than ever that remove a lot of the management burden but leave you with all the benefits of having a cluster, e.g., Talos Linux.

Re: Kubernetes Ingress Nginx is retiring

#43
post #30
post #19

How do you people even keep up with this? I'm going back to cybersecurity after trying DevOps for a year, it's not for me. I miss my sysadmin days, things were simple back then and worked. Maybe I'm just getting old and my cognitive abilities are declining. It seems to me that the current tech scene doesn't reward simple.

I like devops. It means you get to get ahead of all the issues that you could potentially find in cybersecurity. Sure it's complicated, but at least you'll never be bored. I think the hardest part is that you always feel like you don't have enough time to do everything you need to.

DevOps teams are always running slightly behind and rarely getting ahead of technical debt because they are treated as cost centers by the business (perpetually understaffed) and as “last minute complicated requests that sound simple enough” and “oops our requirements changed” dumping grounds for engineering teams.

Plus, the ops side has a lot of challenges that can really be a different beast compared to the application side. The breadth of knowledge needed for the job is staggering and yet you also need depth in terms of knowing how operating systems and networks work.

Re: Kubernetes Ingress Nginx is retiring

#44
post #39
post #19

How do you people even keep up with this? I'm going back to cybersecurity after trying DevOps for a year, it's not for me. I miss my sysadmin days, things were simple back then and worked. Maybe I'm just getting old and my cognitive abilities are declining. It seems to me that the current tech scene doesn't reward simple.

The Ingress API has been on ice for like 5 years. The core Kubernetes API doesn't change that much, at least these days. There's an infinite number of (questionable) add-ons you can deploy in your cluster, and I think that's mostly where folks get stuck in the mud.

> doesn’t change that much

Yet they are retiring a core Ingress that has been around for almost as long as Kubernetes has.

Re: Kubernetes Ingress Nginx is retiring

#46
post #19

How do you people even keep up with this? I'm going back to cybersecurity after trying DevOps for a year, it's not for me. I miss my sysadmin days, things were simple back then and worked. Maybe I'm just getting old and my cognitive abilities are declining. It seems to me that the current tech scene doesn't reward simple.

/r/kubernetes had this announcement up about five mins after it dropped at Kubecon. It's a huge deal. So many tutorials and products used ingress-nginx for basic ingress, so them throwing in the towel (but not really) is big news.

That said, (a) the Gateway API supercedes Ingress and provides much more functionality without much more complexity, and (b) NGINX and HAproxy have Gateway controllers.

To generally answer your question, I use HN, /r/devops and /r/kubernetes to stay current. I'm also working on a weekly blog series wherein I'll be doing an overview and quick start guide for every CNCF project in their portfolio. There's hundreds (thousands?) of projects in the collection, so it will keep me busy until I retire, probably :)

Re: Kubernetes Ingress Nginx is retiring

#48
post #41
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It seems to me that the current tech scene doesn't reward simple. A deal with the devil was made. The C suite gets to tell a story that k8s practices let you suck every penny out of the compute you already paid for. Modern devs get to do constant busy work adding complexity everywhere, creating job security and opportunities to use fun new toys. "Here's how we're using AI to right size our pods! Never mind the actu…

This just seems like sensationalist nonsense spoken by someone who hasn’t done a second of Ops work. Kubernetes is incredibly reliable compared to traditional infrastructure. It eliminates a ton of the configuration management dependency hellscape and inconsistent application deployments that traditional infrastructure entails. Immutable containers provide a major benefit to development velocity and deployment reliab…

It was clear they didn't know what they were saying when they think the main reason for kubernetes was to save money. Kubernetes is just easy to complain about.

Re: Kubernetes Ingress Nginx is retiring

#49
post #39
post #19

How do you people even keep up with this? I'm going back to cybersecurity after trying DevOps for a year, it's not for me. I miss my sysadmin days, things were simple back then and worked. Maybe I'm just getting old and my cognitive abilities are declining. It seems to me that the current tech scene doesn't reward simple.

The Ingress API has been on ice for like 5 years. The core Kubernetes API doesn't change that much, at least these days. There's an infinite number of (questionable) add-ons you can deploy in your cluster, and I think that's mostly where folks get stuck in the mud.

But the Gateway API has only been generally available for two years now. And the last time I checked, most managed K8S solutions recommend the Ingress API while Gateway support is still experimental.

Re: Kubernetes Ingress Nginx is retiring

#50
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's exactly why taking a trip through the ops/infra side is so important for people - you learn why LTS-style engineering is so important. You learn to pick technologies that are stable, reliable, well-supported by a large-enough people who are conservative in their approach, for anything foundational, because the alternative is migration pain again and again.

I also feel like we as an industry should steer towards a state of "doneness" for OSS solutions. As long as it works, it's fine to keep using technologies that are only sparsely maintained.

Ingress-Nginx is commonly internet facing though; I think everyone wants at least base image and ssl upgrades on that component…
Post reply on HN