Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
1–10 of 105 posts
Re: Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
#2Re: Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
#3Re: Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
#4I don’t know enough about this to be sure, but this feels like a white whale.
Re: Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
#5I don’t know enough about this to be sure, but this feels like a white whale.
I feel LeCun is correct that LLMs as of now have limitations where it needs an architectural overhaul. LLMs now have a problem with context rot, and this would hamper with an effective world model if the world disintegrates and becomes incoherent and hallucinated over time.
It'd doubtful whether investors would be in for the long haul, which may explain the behavior of Sam Altman in seeking government support. The other approaches described in this article may be more investor friendly as there is a more immediate return with creating a 3D asset or a virtual simulation.
Re: Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
#6Re: Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
#7Re: Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
#8That being said there have been models which are pretty effective at other things that don’t use language, so maybe it’s a non issue.
Re: Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models"
#9I don’t know enough about this to be sure, but this feels like a white whale.