Live data from Hacker News

Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

techcrunch.com

81–90 of 456 posts

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#81
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Truly curious - have you tried it recently?

Daily. I'm still unable to leave my culdesac without phantom leaves causing phantom braking.

There was a time when I believed in the hype, I'm less skeptical than most. But the evidence now is incontrovertible.

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#82
post #38
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

That's a great way to make them targets for vandalism. I'm in a city they're about to get in to (Nashville), and if the snitch-mobile tattled on everyone (the highways here that are officially 55 are "really" 75 with some exceptions, and going the speed limit can end up being more dangerous), sensors would start getting bullet holes. Of course, unlike the normal car break-ins here, the cops might do something about t…

How about you just change the speed limits to 75 then

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#83

I was in SF a few weekend ago and rode both Waymo and normal Lyft style taxi cars. the Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. The Waymos were just smooth consistent driving. No aggressive driving to get you dumped off so they can get to the next fair.

Waymo is overly conservative last time I checked. Driving the speed limit basically means getting to your destination twice as slow.

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#84
post #68

I was in SF a few weekend ago and rode both Waymo and normal Lyft style taxi cars. the Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. The Waymos were just smooth consistent driving. No aggressive driving to get you dumped off so they can get to the next fair.

> Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. These sentances conflict. I recently took a taxi from JFK to Manhattan during rush hour, and I estimate if the driver didn't use all of the paved surface, it would have taken at least 10 more minutes to arrive. (And it wouldn't have been an authentic NYC experience) It's ok if you prefe…

Uh...driving in the shoulder is illegal.

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#85
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. These sentances conflict. I recently took a taxi from JFK to Manhattan during rush hour, and I estimate if the driver didn't use all of the paved surface, it would have taken at least 10 more minutes to arrive. (And it wouldn't have been an authentic NYC experience) It's ok if you prefe…

> These sentances conflict. I recently took a taxi from JFK to Manhattan during rush hour, and I estimate if the driver didn't use all of the paved surface, it would have taken at least 10 more minutes to arrive. (And it wouldn't have been an authentic NYC experience) My hot take is that people who "use all of the paved surface" because their whiny passenger is "in a rush" (which of course everyone stuck in traffic i…

My hot take is that anyone who would take a taxi from JFK to Manhattan, along the most well-served transit corridor on the continent, is probably a psycho and we shouldn't ask for their input on transportation topics.

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#86
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> These sentances conflict. I recently took a taxi from JFK to Manhattan during rush hour, and I estimate if the driver didn't use all of the paved surface, it would have taken at least 10 more minutes to arrive. (And it wouldn't have been an authentic NYC experience) My hot take is that people who "use all of the paved surface" because their whiny passenger is "in a rush" (which of course everyone stuck in traffic i…

My hot take is that anyone who would take a taxi from JFK to Manhattan, along the most well-served transit corridor on the continent, is probably a psycho and we shouldn't ask for their input on transportation topics.

JFK to Manhattan is actually not that easy for a newcomer. JFK → Airtrain → LIRR → Subway is a very stupid design.

That said, yes GP is obviously a psycho.

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#87
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. These sentances conflict. I recently took a taxi from JFK to Manhattan during rush hour, and I estimate if the driver didn't use all of the paved surface, it would have taken at least 10 more minutes to arrive. (And it wouldn't have been an authentic NYC experience) It's ok if you prefe…

You want your cab driver to drive on the shoulder and break the law? What?

You may want to become aware of the existence of New York City. It's a pretty interesting place.

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had a similar experience. A few months ago, I was in the city for a weekend and took Waymo for most of my rides. The one time I chose to use Lyft/Uber, the driver floored it before we even had a chance to shut the door or get buckled! The rest of the time we took Waymo. I rarely use ride-sharing but other experiences include having been in a FSD Tesla Uber where the driver wasn't paying attention to the road the en…

It must be interesting being an Uber driver right now and literally watching the robots that will replace you driving around with you. This has been a 15+ year process and will probably take a few more years. I don't feel too bad if they didn't manage to pivot in that time period.

"It must be interesting being an Uber driver right now and literally watching the robots that will replace you driving around with you."

You mean the way taxi drivers had to watch as Uber and Lyft replaced them?

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#89
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> These sentances conflict. I recently took a taxi from JFK to Manhattan during rush hour, and I estimate if the driver didn't use all of the paved surface, it would have taken at least 10 more minutes to arrive. (And it wouldn't have been an authentic NYC experience) My hot take is that people who "use all of the paved surface" because their whiny passenger is "in a rush" (which of course everyone stuck in traffic i…

My hot take is that anyone who would take a taxi from JFK to Manhattan, along the most well-served transit corridor on the continent, is probably a psycho and we shouldn't ask for their input on transportation topics.

Oh my sweet summer child.

I've got news for you about how dysfunctional New York City transit planning has been and the status of transit to our three giant airports.

Re: Waymo robotaxis are now giving rides on freeways in LA, SF and Phoenix

#90
post #83

I was in SF a few weekend ago and rode both Waymo and normal Lyft style taxi cars. the Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. The Waymos were just smooth consistent driving. No aggressive driving to get you dumped off so they can get to the next fair.

Waymo is overly conservative last time I checked. Driving the speed limit basically means getting to your destination twice as slow.

You realize it's technically illegal to drive faster than the speed limit, right? In the eyes of the law, it's doesn't matter whether everyone else is doing it or not.
Post reply on HN