Live data from Hacker News

The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

steveblank.com

301–310 of 527 posts

Re: The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

#301
Why are they not calling it Department of Defense?

Department of War hasn't been in used since 1947:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Wa...

https://www.war.gov/

I'm quite concernedd by the decision to use again terms such as department of War. It feels we are going back to war-driven nationalism.

Re: The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

#303
post #144
post #41

> Design For Rapid Scale In a Crisis One of the things that I think Anduril (Palmer Luckey and other founders) is doing right is designing for manufacturability. The invasion of Ukraine has shown that future conflicts will use up weapons at a very high pace. And that the US capability to build them at the rate needed to sustain conflict isn't there anymore. But that one thing that could help is making them easier to…

What’s up with Maga people using LotR names for their military/panopticon companies? Anduril, Palantir, Lembas have I seen so far.

Nerd culture. Def not maga, more silicon valley and tech startup types.

Re: The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

#304
post #41

> Design For Rapid Scale In a Crisis One of the things that I think Anduril (Palmer Luckey and other founders) is doing right is designing for manufacturability. The invasion of Ukraine has shown that future conflicts will use up weapons at a very high pace. And that the US capability to build them at the rate needed to sustain conflict isn't there anymore. But that one thing that could help is making them easier to…

> sustain conflict

...this turn of phrase in relation to goal-setting really makes you think twice.

Re: The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

#305
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Manufacturing in western countries was gutted by the price of labor (read: rising standard of living relative to global averages). 1. It's difficult to manufacture competitively when a local living wage is in the upper echelons of global wages. 2. It's often cheaper to manufacture something semi-manually (e.g. 80% automated) than invest in buying and maintaining full automation.

The Chinese laborers working in BYD and foxconn factories have higher wages than their equivalents in Mexico and Vietnam building products sold for 3-5x as much in the US. The cheapest labor in the world is found in Africa and yet Western industrial manufacturing has largely ignored the continent. The price of labor isn't the most important factor here.

> The Chinese laborers working in BYD and foxconn factories have higher wages than their equivalents in Mexico and Vietnam building products sold for 3-5x as much in the US.

I'm having a hard time parsing this. Also, source?

> The cheapest labor in the world is found in Africa and yet Western industrial manufacturing has largely ignored the continent. The price of labor isn't the most important factor here.

... Yeah this seems fair. I think a lot of Africa has an infrastructure problem - it doesn't matter how cheaply you can manufacture if you can't move large volumes of raw materials/parts to the factory and finished goods from the factory. Plus many areas in Africa have security issues which make them less attractive places to do business. Geographically, a lot of the continent is cursed with hard to navigate rivers as well (the upper Nile being an exception), so only coastal shipping is really viable.

Re: The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

#308

Get ready for the Department Of Corruption

You think it wasn't corrupt previously?

Well compared to countries that don't have these checks and balances, not overly corrupt. But it's not possible to have a government without corruption at least at some level.

But if you take these checks and balances away, say goodbye to "good" governance.

Re: The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

#309

As someone who has some familiarity with this process, just like safety regulations are written in blood, Federal Acquisition rules are written in misuse of money, sometimes criminally. Yes, we have swung too much towards the bureaucrats but I'm not sure throwing out everything is solution to the issue. Move fast works great when it's B2B software and failures means stock price does not go up. It's not so great when…

Today's societal war is a philosophical one - do you think everything sucks and it's a matter of lesser evil, or do you think everything sucks and we "just" need to find the perfect solution.

Re: The Department of War just shot the accountants and opted for speed

#310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have to be completely insane to think China is not an adversary. Personally, I think we are in WW3 right now and we have already lost. Americans are just too lazy and insular to read anything involving Chinese military strategy. I can't think of more basic Chinese military strategy than to avoid a head-on battle with a strong enemy. You beat the strong enemy by every means other than a head-on battle. We are wait…

You have to be completely insane, or so deep in propaganda you are about to drink the cool-aid and ascend to the next life, to think you are currently at war with China.

Yet so many Americans really do believe that China is the boogey man de jour, out to steal their freedom.

How many armed conflicts or foreign coups has China started or supported in the past 50 years? What about America? How many people has China executed with drone strikes in the past 15 years? And America?

It's absolute madness that people are buying into this war-mongering FUD.

Post reply on HN