Live data from Hacker News

A modern 35mm film scanner for home

soke.engineering

141–150 of 198 posts

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#141
post #41

The fact that there is still no sample scans has me heated - instead of showing us all these specs, how about some sample images!!

It doesn't seem to exist yet. The specifications are not specifications, they are design goals. I don't see how they can get the color coverage they're claiming with RGB LEDs. Seems about as credible as a lot of the crowdfunded stuff.

    The specifications are not specifications, they are design goals.
So they're… speculatios?

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#142
post #134

I got my relatively portable scanner for around ~100 euros, plus the software for 100 as well if I’m not mistaken. And it works fine. It’s weird for me that with the advancing technology people keep coming up with higher price with an excuse of approach, design, whatever. This seems like an overpriced piece of tech for niche connoisseurs. And I don’t like it.

What scanner are you using, out of curiosity?

Funny thing is, in general, low and midrange desktop scanners that public can generally buy, haven't changed much in 10-20 years since they started using led lights and IR dust removal (Canon Fare, Digital ICE or similar stuff). Some are even the same hardware just slightly rebadged or with a different USB connector. But they're the same price or more expensive.

And, at a different level, professional film scanners are EXPENSIVE. Lots of people are now scanning their film using a digital camera and led backlight (now that there is affordable good quality led lights) instead of a dedicated scanner. But that's not very fast and requires some extra manual work. If this scanner offers reasonable quality and a good workflow (that not very proprietary or closed), 1000-1500 dollars is a reasonable price, especially if you have lots of film coming in, or an old collection to scan.

I could imagine my dad buying one of this to scan his hundreds and hundreds of rolls from the 70s/80s and then selling it once he finish. It would be like 1-3 USD per rolled scanned :)

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Coolscans used RGB LEDs.

It seems like folks buy a used Coolscan, scan their stuff, then sell it. They seem to last pretty well. I'm about to buy a used one to scan my Dad's old slides. And then sell it.

What's a reasonable model with a semiautomatic workflow (that I don't have to work manually frame by frame) for that? A 5000ED or something like that?

I could do that for my dad too...

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#144
post #41

The fact that there is still no sample scans has me heated - instead of showing us all these specs, how about some sample images!!

There are a few scans on Instagram, I'd charitably describe them as "dogshit".

Ah, so bad. I got excited for a second.

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#145
At this point I'm mystified at any film scanner that doesn't also offer an advance mechanism for motion-picture film.

Otherwise you can use a slide-copier attachment on a DSLR, taking multiple exposures if necessary to achieve whatever dynamic range you want.

I don't get it.

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't seem to exist yet. The specifications are not specifications, they are design goals. I don't see how they can get the color coverage they're claiming with RGB LEDs. Seems about as credible as a lot of the crowdfunded stuff.

The Coolscans used RGB LEDs.

They also sucked. I had an LS-2000 and the images were noisy as hell and it couldn't scan negatives for shit. I sold it on eBay. It's incredible how overrated the Nikon scanners were.

In the end I found a new in-box Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400 II, pretty much the end of the line for film scanners. I haven't tried it yet!

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#147
post #134

I got my relatively portable scanner for around ~100 euros, plus the software for 100 as well if I’m not mistaken. And it works fine. It’s weird for me that with the advancing technology people keep coming up with higher price with an excuse of approach, design, whatever. This seems like an overpriced piece of tech for niche connoisseurs. And I don’t like it.

What scanner are you using, out of curiosity? Funny thing is, in general, low and midrange desktop scanners that public can generally buy, haven't changed much in 10-20 years since they started using led lights and IR dust removal (Canon Fare, Digital ICE or similar stuff). Some are even the same hardware just slightly rebadged or with a different USB connector. But they're the same price or more expensive. And, at a…

In the "things that fit on your desk" category, slow is pretty relative - people on ebay still want thousands for Nikon 9000 scanners, and those were not fast if you were scanning high-res 16-bit. And always needed time in post too (cropping/straightening/tweaking exposure and color). An ILC kit can go a lot more quickly.

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#148
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a cancer on the web. Apple started it and I hate them for it. And I’m an Apple fan. If I wanted to wait 1/2 second for each part of the page to load I’d have stayed on dialup.

Wasn't the NYT that started this?

Nike mainstreamed it, I think - https://onepagelove.com/nike-better-world

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#149
post #23

I wish the fancy scroll nonsense would go away. For example I wanted to look at the first picture in the horizontal gallery that scrolls horizontally when you scroll vertically. However, there is no way for me to view the whole image. Either it is cutoff at the bottom, or it starts horizontally scrolling. Switching from vertical to horizontal scrolling is awkward and I just want to skip the gallery. scrolling on that…

Annoying as hell. WTF.

Re: A modern 35mm film scanner for home

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not that they're cheap, but you can get Imacon scanners for much less than they retailed for. I inherited a Flextight Precision II and it still does a great job.

Do you use it with an old computer, or do you have a good way to interface a SCSI scanner with a modern machine? I tried to get my Precision II up and running but the SCSI card driver would crash Windows at random intervals.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250118205639/http://pathar.tl/...

This is way out of date. I have since been able to get it working on a Windows 11 4th gen Intel machine with 64-bit drivers cobbled together from a couple of versions of FlexColor and some .inf modification. It's not flawless, there's some major corruption that can occur when trying to use certain operations, but overall it works for my needs.

Post reply on HN