"Yes, some may raise the argument that the reason why Jobs was rarely in situations to apologize, was because, for the most part (minus Siri), he pushed excellent and complete product" Please, macosx releases have an history of being bug ridden. So much that one upgrade was free (the first one, if I recall correctly). The man built his own legend by rewriting history and bullying press. And selling computers, phones…
Apple Has a New Cook
11–20 of 51 posts
Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#12> We want to do the right thing for our valued iPhone customers. We apologize for disappointing some of you, and we are doing our best to live up to your high expectations of Apple.
vs
> Everything we do at Apple is aimed at making our products the best in the world. We know that you expect that from us, and we will keep working non-stop until Maps lives up to the same incredibly high standard.
Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#13They blew this, they blew this, they blew this. They failed to reset customer expectations, walked directly into a woodchipper with a serious platform regression, and gave their competitors a talking point that will actually stick for the next few years.
The only interesting bit of Apple Kremlinology that can be engaged in here: did they intentionally portray the maps as an advance in an attempt to keep iphone 5 pre-orders up? Because there is no way Apple had convinced themselves this was launch worthy internally. They cannot have become that self-unaware already.
I imagine this apology was written months ago.
Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#14Steve jobs did let Ping and Mobile Me go out the doors. Oh yes, and the Apple Cube.
Neither Ping nor Mobile Me replaced previous crucial functionality.
Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#15Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#16Jobs had a tendency to do the latter. He would rarely admit Apple's mistakes verbally, but would correct the problem as swiftly as possible. This strategy (obviously) worked pretty well for Apple's bottom line, and it's hard to argue that it upset many customers.
Now, I don't have access to the information Apple does, but for this particular situation it seemed much less important that Apple make a apology vs. just improving the product rapidly. You apologize when people feel wronged, slighted, cheated, or otherwise emotionally distraught by your actions.
In this case, there are issues with Maps. But when Maps leads you to the wrong destination, do you feel emotionally hurt by Apple? In my experience, no, you realize the computer messed up and you look at the map and correct it. There's a certain level of tolerance people can have for this type of error they cannot have, for example, when their phones cannot get reception or drop calls due to the antenna.
Beyond this, this is a problem that can be rapidly fixed if Apple dedicated a massive amount of resources to it. As people use Maps, there is a ton of data being collected and lots of low hanging fruit being revealed. The first several months after launch will surely shake most of the major issues out.
Also, I'm absolutely stunned Cook would refer people to other apps (of their competitors!) instead. This is really a punch to the gut for shareholders (disclosure: which I am not) as it looks like they are admitting defeat and willing to concede mindshare for mapping applications.
A much better approach to solving this would be to acknowledge the problem, less apologetically, but more importantly, become transparent with the rate at which issues are being fixed. Publish some metrics that show how hard Apple is working on things being fixed. Push an update to the app that highlights these improvements. Make people realize Apple is putting all of its energy into addressing the problem, and that progress is being made each day.
Or, do what Jobs did, and just deflect criticism while the engineers fix the problems for a few weeks. Eventually everyone will forget about it, Maps will be the best mapping experience on iOS, and it will become a distant memory.
Knowing when to take these paths is important and IMHO it is not a good sign that Cook went down this road for this particular issue.
Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#17Oh good gravy. While it's wonderful that an apology of sorts was offered, that's not unusual in Apple's history. They blew this, they blew this, they blew this. They failed to reset customer expectations, walked directly into a woodchipper with a serious platform regression, and gave their competitors a talking point that will actually stick for the next few years. The only interesting bit of Apple Kremlinology that…
Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#18Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#19For a CEO, it doesn't matter just weither or not you apologize for a mistake, but what mistakes you apologize for, and what mistakes you simply correct but do not openly apologize for. Jobs had a tendency to do the latter. He would rarely admit Apple's mistakes verbally, but would correct the problem as swiftly as possible. This strategy (obviously) worked pretty well for Apple's bottom line, and it's hard to argue t…
And the derived problem from this is given the knowledge that there are some problems, I would never trust Apple maps unless I know where I am going anyway.
Re: Apple Has a New Cook
#20Oh good gravy. While it's wonderful that an apology of sorts was offered, that's not unusual in Apple's history. They blew this, they blew this, they blew this. They failed to reset customer expectations, walked directly into a woodchipper with a serious platform regression, and gave their competitors a talking point that will actually stick for the next few years. The only interesting bit of Apple Kremlinology that…
Actually, since the maps coverage is pretty good in California, I wouldn't be that surprised if they didn't realize just how far behind Google their POI data was internationally. Also, even if they did realize this, I don't think they would gone forward so eagerly if they realized how intense the backlash was going to be.
But I can't believe that they would go toe-for-toe on the map client feature set without similar attention being paid to overall database quality.
They've licensed dozens of data sources, they've bought entire companies, they've been working on this for years...
I think they pulled the trigger for a variety of reasons and then braced for impact. This change wasn't taken lightly.