Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
1–10 of 64 posts
Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#2Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#3Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#4I hope the new theme allows for more customization than the old Material theme. It was really hard to create a unique brand identity within the constraints of Material; it just wasn't built with customization in mind beyond a color. The "modern" theme looks minimal in a way that gives me some hope for this.
Looking forward to kicking the tires on Zensical!
Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#5I don’t really care how long it takes to build as long as it’s not minutes. Also don’t care about “modern” look whatever that means really. And I have lots of custom components that (I assume?) would be hard to migrate
Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#6Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#7Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#8I am also very curious about what the MKDocs future would be like. Material has been the most popular theme for MkDocs. People are not using it because they have chosen MkDocs, but using MkDocs because they have chosen Material. With Zensical promising (some kind of) MkDocs compatibility, there will be fewer reasons to stay on MkDocs instead of migrating to the new project.
Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#9Bold to move away from both of the things that contributed to their success initially (mkdocs, material design) at once.
Re: Zensical – A modern static site generator built by the Material for MkDocs team
#10I was excited up until they showed what the new theme looks like. mkdocs-Material was nice in that it didn't have overly rounded corners and over travesties, a shame that custom CSS will be needed to undo the "modernisation". Overall this seems very interesting, especially the performance improvements, just a letdown visually.