Live data from Hacker News

I was right about dishwasher pods and now I can prove it [video]

youtube.com

341–350 of 504 posts

Re: I was right about dishwasher pods and now I can prove it [video]

#342
post #130

I love that there are people who will go into this much detail on stuff. It's really cool that they do. But the whole thing is that if you follow some sequence of steps, powder will clean as well as or better than pods for a third the cost. All right, this isn't a significant portion of my expenses so I'll pay the 3x cost since my dishes come out clean anyway. I wish the description of the video was like an abstract.

For long videos, I have a script that fetches the transcript using yt-dlp and pipes it to an LLM for keypoints. If the content sounds interesting, I watch it; if not, I save 45 minutes.

I did something similar but as a Chrome extension using Gemini 2.5 Flash (or Flash Lite) for summarizing.

On the page it shows an extra TLDR button near the like button.

You can change the prompt to modify how the summary looks and has an optional mode with links to specific timestamps.

Re: I was right about dishwasher pods and now I can prove it [video]

#343

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That beats the point of the dishwasher for me. I don’t really want to do any pre rinsing or scrubbing/wiping. If I’m doing that, I might as well just use a sponge with soap for an extra five seconds and wash the dish completely.

If the dish has bits of e.g. vegetable matter beyond a certain size which would ultimately need to be manually cleaned out the dish washer's filter after some time, then I will at least scrape off the contents of the plate first, and occasionally I may do a 2 second rinse of a plate under my tap.

You mean you don't eat all your food? Disgraceful! Children starving in Africa etc.

Re: I was right about dishwasher pods and now I can prove it [video]

#344

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He mentioned that it's not due to voltage but rather low current circuits. A 15 amp circuit translates to around 1,800 watts in the US and if you derate it to 80% of that like the NEC requires a continuous load you'd have around 1,440 watts available. His argument is that appliance manufacturers are trying to simplify their lineup by making models that would work in homes without a dedicated circuit (15 or 20 amp). A…

It's the same issue, if you have a higher voltage then you can get more power without increasing current. For example in Australia a standard house circuit is 10 Amps, but because it's at 240V we can get 2400 Watts (realistically more like 2300) out of a _standard_ wall outlet that is in every room of your house.

Meanwhile, here in Germany, we have 230V, but every standard wall outlet is rated for 16A continuous load over 1 hour so you can get 3.6 kW on each circuit.

Your standard home has a supply of 3 phase power @ 35A (southern Germany) or 63A (northern and western Germany), I think only the former GDR is at standard 3x25A, because like in many former Communist countries they had to save on expensive copper and aluminium, and since a lot of the GDR was heated by steam-based central district heating systems, you didn't need that much power anyway.

Re: I was right about dishwasher pods and now I can prove it [video]

#345

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Come to think of it, if there is a latching door on the detergent tray, your dishwasher definitely has a prewash cycle, or else they’d skip the door entirely Alec also mentions this briefly in the linked video; if manufacturers could avoid the cost of a latching mechanism, they absolutely would. Its presence means a pre-wash cycle exists.

The default program on my Miele pops the door open like 2 minutes into the cycle. Maybe the slower ones don't?

[deleted]

Re: I was right about dishwasher pods and now I can prove it [video]

#347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think boiling water with dishwasher detergent in it is a great idea (because of potential fumes). I might have misunderstood what you mean by "make coffee" but maybe something to look into if you do this regularly.

By „make coffee“ I meant „use the coffee maker as usual, without ground beans but with detergent in the water“. The fume/steam is surely not healthy if inhaled directly and up close, but then again your dishwasher vents those same fumes into your kitchen untreated in much larger quantities than a 200ml coffee maker possibly can. I regularly use things to clean that I am more worried about, such as bleach, acetone, tu…

I don't know, man.

I don't have a theoretical explanation, especially one that won't be batted away by another theoretical explanation.

I just feel like there's better ways to clean your coffee maker than putting dishwasher detergent/powder/whatever in it and running a coffee making cycle. Sounds like a horrible* idea.

* I should offer a "why" - off the top of my head: if it rinsed out that quick, why does the dishwasher take so long?

Re: I was right about dishwasher pods and now I can prove it [video]

#348
post #130

I love that there are people who will go into this much detail on stuff. It's really cool that they do. But the whole thing is that if you follow some sequence of steps, powder will clean as well as or better than pods for a third the cost. All right, this isn't a significant portion of my expenses so I'll pay the 3x cost since my dishes come out clean anyway. I wish the description of the video was like an abstract.

For long videos, I have a script that fetches the transcript using yt-dlp and pipes it to an LLM for keypoints. If the content sounds interesting, I watch it; if not, I save 45 minutes.

Mind sharing the script? It's becoming a big problem to me: people send me links to "must watch videos" but neither the title nor description nor subchapter titles tell me what it actually is about.

In this particular case, it's spending 40 minutes of my life on something that could be explained in 4 sentences.

Re: I was right about dishwasher pods and now I can prove it [video]

#349
post #333
post #270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've used a washing machine like this. For the feature to be useful, it has to be correctly implemented. Unfortunately, all r&d budget apparently, goes into developing vendor's mobile application and wifi connectivity, not on basic mechanics inside.

which is still weird, because those apps are always terrible and the connection always insecure

Apps are not for you, but for advertisers. UX is a secondary concern, generating additional revenue stream is the goal.
Post reply on HN