Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Whereas if you take the extraordinarily difficult step of opening Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox ), you understand the real paradox. Jevons observed that when steam engines get more efficient and individually use less coal, we end up deploying many more steam engines in many new industries and use cases, increasing coal consumption overall. What difference do you see in this paragraph comp…
> Steam engines get more coal-efficient and that means there are more of them burning more coal. This misses the key part that actually makes it Jevons Paradox: the reduced cost of operating the machine opened up new industries and applications that massively grew which made overall usage increase. Something could get more efficient and still have the same number of units in the end. Washing machines have gotten more…
> Washing machines have gotten more efficient over time and yet it's not like we have tons more washing machines in the US.
Do you have any numbers for this?